Scan to Download Gate App

More Download Options

Don't remind me again today

ChainSeaDigger

2025-11-25 18:44:11

Picture this: an AI that doesn't belong to a single corporation. One where decisions happen onchain, contributors get rewarded for their work, and autonomous teams spin up to solve problems nobody even assigned. That's not some distant fantasy—projects are already sketching out what that infrastructure looks like.

Take what's happening with decentralized intelligence platforms. Instead of siloed models locked behind corporate walls, we're seeing experiments with collaborative AI systems where governance lives onchain and economic incentives align participants. The shift isn't just philosophical—it's architectural.

The agentic economy isn't arriving someday. It's being assembled right now, piece by piece. Intelligence is fragmenting, distributing, finding new forms. And the blueprint? It's being written in real-time by builders betting that openness beats closed systems in the long game.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkYouPayMe

· 11-28 18:43

Sounds good, but how many truly decentralized governance AI platforms can survive the next bear market? --- On-chain decision-making sounds nice, but what about actual execution... power will still gradually concentrate, right? --- I’m optimistic about this direction; it’s much more interesting than Meta’s closed system. --- I’ve heard so much about agentic economy; the key is that the incentive mechanisms must be designed robustly enough. --- Open systems defeating closed ones? Ha, should we take a bet? --- Can autonomously spun-up agents truly self-coordinate? I have some doubts about that. --- Decentralized AI sounds great, but right now these projects are just a bunch of tokenomics games. --- Governance on-chain but it’s still an oligopoly on the chain... just concentrated in a different place. --- Finally, someone said it; sharding intelligence is much more reliable than a single giant model.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 11-27 12:55

Decentralization AI sounds good, but can it really be faster than OpenAI? --- onchain governance + autonomous agents, it feels more like the complexity has been dispersed, not sure who should be responsible --- Fragmented intelligence sounds trendy, but who will ensure the quality? --- The economic incentive alignment aspect is indeed interesting, much better than being trapped by big companies --- Wait, has this infrastructure really been implemented, or is it still just theoretical? --- Agentic economy means distributing AI's decision-making power to more people, it's a bit like democratization but not that simple --- An open system can't compete with a closed loop, in the long run, it still depends on network effects ---

View OriginalReply0

AirdropworkerZhang

· 11-26 10:42

Sounds good, but can this really be implemented... right now it's just a pile of concepts piled up. On-chain governance sounds simple, but when interests conflict, it will still be a struggle... However, I have to admit, this direction is much more pleasant than being locked up by big companies. Let's talk again when there are actually projects that have been successfully run, and not end up as the next concept coin.

View OriginalReply0

PrivateKeyParanoia

· 11-25 19:14

Ngl, the narrative of this decentralized AI sounds very sexy, but how many projects can actually land and run? --- After hearing so many times that "it's happening", what’s the result? Still a bunch of White Papers and air. --- The combination of on-chain governance + economic incentives is indeed tempting, but I wonder who will pay for the bugs. --- Can open really win against closed systems? I doubt it; it's still a game driven by interests. --- Wait, autonomous teams generated to solve problems? That sounds like another excuse for people to lose their jobs, haha. --- Architecturally shift sounds expensive, but in reality, I don't know what it can actually run. --- I've heard this logic in another ten projects before, and in the end? There was no follow-up. --- So the core issue is whether the incentive mechanism can truly align? Or is it just another trick for Large Investors to play retail investors for suckers?

View OriginalReply0

MetaDreamer

· 11-25 19:13

Ngl, this is the correct way to open AI, distributed governance + economic incentives can really change the game rules --- On-chain decision-making sounds good, but what about the execution level... can it really run through? --- An open system can't compete with giants, thinking too much; in the end, money matters are decided by power of discourse --- autonomous teams organizing themselves to solve problems? This sounds like talking about DAO 2.0 --- Wait, how exactly do they reward "contributors get rewarded"? Is it token distribution or some other mechanism? --- Fragmented intelligence is the future, don't let centralized large models kidnap you anymore --- If this system can really run, then web3 can finally find its killer application --- That’s one-sided, decentralized does not equal better; sometimes efficiency will just be sacrificed --- Organizing autonomous teams on-chain? When you calculate the gas fee, it will be a total loss, haha

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 11-25 19:12

ngl, the future depicted here sounds a bit too idealistic, but is it really happening? I believe in the on-chain governance system, but there are still only a few projects that can actually run smoothly.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 11-25 19:05

ngl, Decentralization AI sounds great, but can it really allocate the incentive mechanism well... It feels like in the end, it will still be decided by Large Investors.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMortgage

· 11-25 18:56

ngl this is the future of my dreams, Decentralization AI is really coming --- onchain governance + incentive alignment is much better than those big companies working behind closed doors --- Wait, can this really be scaled? Or is it just another concept hype --- I believe that open systems will ultimately win, now it's just a matter of who can get the infrastructure right --- Autonomous teams organizing themselves to solve problems? Just thinking about it is exciting, but the risks are quite high --- builders are writing blueprints in real-time... feeling like I'm going to miss out on a k-billion opportunity --- Distributed intelligence is coming, is the centralized large model going to fail?

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 11-25 18:54

ngl this "decentralized AI" narrative is getting spicy but where's the actual arbitrage play here... governance tokens gonna bleed out once mempool gets analyzed properly fr

Reply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
224.92K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
17.93K Popularity
#GIGGLEAndPIPPINSurge
3.08K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
2.5K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
3.25K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
MARYSMary S
MC:$3.4KHolders:2
0.00%
2
CHIPChip-in
MC:$3.41KHolders:2
0.09%
3
морекоты
MC:$3.32KHolders:1
0.00%
4
ZYGO戴歌青蛙
MC:$3.37KHolders:1
0.29%
5
XYY喜羊羊
MC:$3.31KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap