Recently, I engaged in on-chain Futures Trading and experienced a decentralized Perptual Futures platform. Compared to the operation methods of CEX, on-chain contracts offer a stronger sense of asset control, and the transparency of the liquidation mechanism is high. DEX derivation platforms like Aster bring traditional contract gameplay onto the chain, and they have done well in terms of trading Depth and Slippage control. For players accustomed to on-chain operations, this is a direction worth trying.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotLaborer
· 11-30 11:11
On-chain perpetual contracts are much easier to control slippage than I imagined when I first started playing.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 11-30 02:28
Hmm... The slippage of Aster is really not as outrageous as I imagined before, it's acceptable.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 11-27 12:57
Not enough depth, still have to return to CEX, slippage is killing.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 11-27 12:49
On-chain perpetuals are really appealing; I can never go back to a centralized exchange.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTherapist
· 11-27 12:47
Is this thing really reliable? The slippage is small, but I'm afraid that when the depth is not enough, it will cause a liquidation.
Recently, I engaged in on-chain Futures Trading and experienced a decentralized Perptual Futures platform. Compared to the operation methods of CEX, on-chain contracts offer a stronger sense of asset control, and the transparency of the liquidation mechanism is high. DEX derivation platforms like Aster bring traditional contract gameplay onto the chain, and they have done well in terms of trading Depth and Slippage control. For players accustomed to on-chain operations, this is a direction worth trying.