Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

The U.S. Treasury just dropped a policy memo that's raising eyebrows across financial circles. They're rolling out new measures to intercept remittances flowing out of the country from undocumented individuals. Here's the kicker—any transfer exceeding $2,000 is now getting flagged for review. This marks a significant escalation in monitoring cross-border money flows, and it's happening under the current administration's watch. The move could reshape how remittance corridors operate, especially for regions heavily dependent on these transfers. For anyone in the crypto space paying attention to regulatory winds, this signals tighter scrutiny on alternative payment rails. Traditional remittance channels already face compliance hurdles, but this adds another layer. Could push more people toward decentralized solutions, or will it trigger even broader crackdowns on all forms of cross-border value transfer? Worth watching how enforcement actually plays out versus what's on paper.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CommunityWorkervip
· 9h ago
The U.S. Treasury is being quite aggressive with this move, requiring scrutiny for remittances over $2000? Isn't this just forcing people to go on-chain, haha?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGasvip
· 10h ago
Really, $2000 flat? This game logic is ridiculous, it's just pushing people on-chain. The on-chain evidence is in black and white, they can't stop it.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 12-01 03:18
Ha, this is good, with the $2000 card limit, will there be another round of scrutiny? Are the days of offshore workers coming to an end? People will definitely rush to go on-chain, what else can they do... Wait, are they trying to force everyone to use crypto... it's a bit ironic, isn't it? Once this policy is implemented, the volume of certain stablecoins is likely to rise sharply. By the way, can enforcement really keep up, or is it just another "paper governance"? The $2000 standard is here, small amount multiple transfers? Don't the regulators think of that? Damn, the remittance corridor is really going to change dramatically, someone in Latin America is bound to cry. On-chain records without paper, on-chain without borders, this is truly bulletproof.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 11-29 04:53
2000 dollars for a flag, traditional remittance should really be in a panic now... it's increasingly looking like they're forcing people to use on-chain solutions.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 11-29 04:53
$2000 this threshold is a bit magical, how much money can it really stop... Instead of following this, why not see when the bridge fees can come down.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 11-29 04:42
Ha, here it comes again, a flat rate of 2000 dollars, now traditional remittances and on-chain transfers are going to explode.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegenvip
· 11-29 04:36
The U.S. Treasury Department is stirring things up again, transfers over $2000 are going to be monitored? It's really time to consider on-chain now, traditional channels are already complicated enough.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivorvip
· 11-29 04:25
Here we go again, I've seen this trap back in 2018. A boundary of 2000 dollars sounds pretty intimidating, but how does it actually play out? It's just paper talk. History tells me that every time the regulatory authorities shout about cracking down on something, the big fish still swim freely while the retail investors get fleeced. To those betting on decentralized solutions this time, don't get too excited, just wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)