In the past 24 hours, a series of policy actions have made the market sense something unusual. As a participant who has been navigating this market for many years, I have noticed that these seemingly unrelated measures may be quietly changing the game rules in the encryption field.

Let's first talk about the two controversial decisions - the amnesty and military deployment. On the surface, it appears to be a display of a tough stance, but it actually conveys a deeper signal: the current government is reshaping its governance style using unconventional methods. This breaking of norms often reflects in the financial regulatory realm. Looking back to 2017, under relatively loose policy conditions, Bitcoin broke through the $20,000 mark directly from four digits.

Look again at the previously invalidated document. This is not just a simple political game. The logic behind it is quite clear: a complete overturning of the previous policy. If this trend continues, the current strict regulation of the encryption industry by the SEC is likely to loosen. Do you remember the day Ripple won the case? XRP's daily increase exceeded 70%—the power of policy shifts should never be underestimated.

As for that transnational phone call and the adjustment of immigration policies, at first glance, it seems unrelated to the cryptocurrency sector. But upon closer examination, when traditional systems experience turbulence, capital will always seek new safe havens. During the trade friction in 2019, Bitcoin's hedging properties were widely recognized for the first time, and its price doubled within six months.

What should I do now? My idea is as follows: keep half of the position as a base, use 30% for swing trading, and leave the remaining 20% as flexible funds. Don't panic because of short-term fluctuations. A real big market often erupts only after the policies become clear.

Ultimately, those who can survive and make money in this market are always the ones who can extract signals from the complex information and remain calm during market panic. Position management is more important than predicting price levels, and risk control is more meaningful than chasing highs and cutting losses.