After reading Chairman Paul Atkins' complete plan for "Project Crypto", to be honest, I feel a bit excited.
As someone who has been in the cryptocurrency space for several years, I am finally seeing the U.S. regulatory environment shift from a vague state of "you don't know, I don't know" to clear guidance on "classify it as it should be classified." The key aspect of this change is that the regulators are finally willing to view innovation with fairness and common sense, rather than treating all tokens as a threat. The U.S. really wants to take a leadership role in the digital finance revolution.
What concerns me the most is that they finally gave a straightforward answer to the soul-searching question that has troubled the entire industry for a decade: Once a token is defined as a security, is it forever a security? Atkins used a Florida orange grove as a metaphor—an investment contract is not a permanent label. When a network is mature enough and control is sufficiently decentralized, this asset should no longer bear the shackles of "security." This judgment logic based on economic reality rather than fixating on labels essentially opens a "de-securitization" green channel for those already decentralized mature projects.
There is also a clear classification of "non-securities" tokens—whether digital goods, collectibles, or utility tokens—which finally provides the industry with the long-awaited certainty. Of course, Atkins also reiterated the bottom line: "Fraud is fraud, regardless of asset type." I fully agree with this attitude; while encouraging innovation, the principle of protecting investors' rights must not be overlooked.
I sincerely hope that the "Innovation Exemption" mechanism, which is expected to be implemented before the end of the year, can be smoothly advanced, allowing the United States to truly become a testing ground for cryptocurrencies. Perhaps it can also attract back investors who have been scared away by various black swan events over the past few months, so that we can all grow stronger in this field together.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerForever
· 25m ago
Finally, someone dares to clarify the rules, this round of regulation is really different.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictim
· 11-30 19:14
Wait, a securitization green channel? This has to be implemented to count, otherwise it's just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 11-29 20:30
Finally, someone made the rules clear, so there's no need to guess anymore. The metaphor of the Florida orange grove is brilliant; tokens will grow too.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamer
· 11-29 20:30
Finally, someone has explained this matter thoroughly. I was pondering this issue three years ago... Now it seems that our persistence was indeed correct.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 11-29 20:27
Finally, it's not a one-size-fits-all approach anymore, this time Atkins has really figured it out. Once the de-securitization channel opens, the breathing sounds of those projects can be heard.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 11-29 20:15
actually, if you run a basic regression analysis on regulatory clarity vs. institutional inflow timelines, you'd see this "green light" narrative conveniently ignores the endogenous variables... but sure, citrus analogies make for great soundbites.
Reply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 11-29 20:14
Finally, someone has clarified things. Otherwise, I've really been confused by the regulations these past few years, and now there is a clear sense of direction.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 11-29 20:06
Finally, we don't have to play guessing games anymore. The U.S. has really shown sincerity this time. The green channel for deregulation has opened up, and those mature projects can finally breathe a sigh of relief.
After reading Chairman Paul Atkins' complete plan for "Project Crypto", to be honest, I feel a bit excited.
As someone who has been in the cryptocurrency space for several years, I am finally seeing the U.S. regulatory environment shift from a vague state of "you don't know, I don't know" to clear guidance on "classify it as it should be classified." The key aspect of this change is that the regulators are finally willing to view innovation with fairness and common sense, rather than treating all tokens as a threat. The U.S. really wants to take a leadership role in the digital finance revolution.
What concerns me the most is that they finally gave a straightforward answer to the soul-searching question that has troubled the entire industry for a decade: Once a token is defined as a security, is it forever a security? Atkins used a Florida orange grove as a metaphor—an investment contract is not a permanent label. When a network is mature enough and control is sufficiently decentralized, this asset should no longer bear the shackles of "security." This judgment logic based on economic reality rather than fixating on labels essentially opens a "de-securitization" green channel for those already decentralized mature projects.
There is also a clear classification of "non-securities" tokens—whether digital goods, collectibles, or utility tokens—which finally provides the industry with the long-awaited certainty. Of course, Atkins also reiterated the bottom line: "Fraud is fraud, regardless of asset type." I fully agree with this attitude; while encouraging innovation, the principle of protecting investors' rights must not be overlooked.
I sincerely hope that the "Innovation Exemption" mechanism, which is expected to be implemented before the end of the year, can be smoothly advanced, allowing the United States to truly become a testing ground for cryptocurrencies. Perhaps it can also attract back investors who have been scared away by various black swan events over the past few months, so that we can all grow stronger in this field together.