Sometimes the simplest path is the right one. Why overcomplicate things with multiple layers when you can build directly on L1? The infrastructure is already there, battle-tested and secure. Just start building.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpBeforeRug
· 16h ago
It's true that l1 direct connections are real, but isn't everyone else with so many layers just fooling around? What about the cost issues, bro?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 12-01 01:41
l1 is forever a god, those shitcoins have to mess with layer 2, but in the end, it's just a bunch of problems.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 12-01 01:41
L1 native believers speak out, alright, let's see how far this simple route can go.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLoss
· 12-01 01:35
What’s the point of directly building on L1? The gas fees are skyrocketing; it's better to use a multi-layer solution. What is this guy thinking?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 12-01 01:27
Ha, it's this trap theory again. Directly using L1 sounds nice, but when the chain gets congested, you'll know what "the simplest is the most complex" really means.
Sometimes the simplest path is the right one. Why overcomplicate things with multiple layers when you can build directly on L1? The infrastructure is already there, battle-tested and secure. Just start building.