To be honest, some topics really don't need to be chewed over repeatedly.

A person's past records are laid out there, and there have been more than one or two failures. Is this kind of case still worth spending time analyzing? Even more outrageous is that some project teams choose such people for promotion. What does this indicate? Either due diligence was not done properly, or they simply don't care about reputation.

Would a team that wants to work long-term be so casual in selecting marketing personnel? When encountering such a combination, my approach is simple—just add it to the observation list, which is basically equivalent to crossing it off. There are so many market opportunities, and there's no need to waste judgment on such projects.