The recent market trend has risen a bit unexpectedly.
There are two triggers: one is that Trump made a statement on social media, saying he would issue $2000 checks to low-income groups; the other is that the market bets that the government shutdown is about to end.
Old Trump's calculations are actually quite obvious - his tariff plan is under scrutiny by the Supreme Court, and the Kalshi platform shows a passage rate of only 23%. At this time, throwing out the promise of "giving money" is essentially creating momentum for himself, trying to use public opinion to bind the court's decision.
The crypto market reacted very directly to this, with short-term sentiment being ignited. After all, the memory of the massive liquidity injection in 2021 has not faded, and many people instinctively associate it with that wave of market movement.
But this time is completely different from last time.
In 2021, money could be distributed because Congress passed a complete fiscal bill. But what about now? The House and Senate are in disarray, and they can't even clean up the mess of a government shutdown. Can we expect them to quickly reach a consensus? It's basically impossible.
More importantly, the source of this $2000 funding is tariff revenue. If the tariffs are deemed illegal, where will the money come from? Old Trump hasn't provided an alternative plan either. So this matter now looks more like a political statement rather than a policy that can be implemented.
The market is driven by sentiment in the short term, but it still depends on the fundamentals in the long term. How far this rebound can go depends on the outcome of subsequent policy negotiations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OPsychology
· 11-12 11:29
Watching the show and eating melons, both big pump and big dump are coming.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 11-12 09:49
It's that season again for throwing money around and harvesting the profits.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 11-11 22:50
Don't be timid, just go for it, All in and it's done.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 11-10 17:28
Once again, it's painting a BTC rise.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLady
· 11-10 05:48
just another bull trap... watch the gas fees tell the real story tbh
Reply0
OnChainDetective
· 11-10 05:47
Don't be played for suckers by large investors; on-chain data shows a suspicious transaction surge of 73.28%. Someone is using Donald Trump's statements to build a position.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 11-10 05:46
scamcoin hits new high, continue All in
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrender
· 11-10 05:44
Old Lot is at it again, who would believe it, they're the fools.
The recent market trend has risen a bit unexpectedly.
There are two triggers: one is that Trump made a statement on social media, saying he would issue $2000 checks to low-income groups; the other is that the market bets that the government shutdown is about to end.
Old Trump's calculations are actually quite obvious - his tariff plan is under scrutiny by the Supreme Court, and the Kalshi platform shows a passage rate of only 23%. At this time, throwing out the promise of "giving money" is essentially creating momentum for himself, trying to use public opinion to bind the court's decision.
The crypto market reacted very directly to this, with short-term sentiment being ignited. After all, the memory of the massive liquidity injection in 2021 has not faded, and many people instinctively associate it with that wave of market movement.
But this time is completely different from last time.
In 2021, money could be distributed because Congress passed a complete fiscal bill. But what about now? The House and Senate are in disarray, and they can't even clean up the mess of a government shutdown. Can we expect them to quickly reach a consensus? It's basically impossible.
More importantly, the source of this $2000 funding is tariff revenue. If the tariffs are deemed illegal, where will the money come from? Old Trump hasn't provided an alternative plan either. So this matter now looks more like a political statement rather than a policy that can be implemented.
The market is driven by sentiment in the short term, but it still depends on the fundamentals in the long term. How far this rebound can go depends on the outcome of subsequent policy negotiations.