Last night, when DOT dropped to 1.69, the market discussion forums were filled with voices like "Breaking new lows, this is really the end." But I was doing the opposite—adding $5,000 during this panic moment, not with a reckless all-in gambler approach, but with a systematic strategy specifically designed to target bottom rebounds. This morning, when DOT hit 1.86, my account showed the strategy was complete, with a total profit of +23.8%. Even more interesting, only one-third of these profits came from the price increase itself; the rest were gained through on-chain structural analysis and white-hat opportunities.
Many people often buy the dip halfway up the mountain, and the key reason is—they only look at candlestick indicators.
Ordinary retail investors see DOT's RSI entering oversold territory and rush in eagerly, often getting trapped in a "downtrend continuation." Why is that? Because true bottom signals are not drawn by technical indicators but are determined by large on-chain transfers and liquidity pool game theory.
When DOT fell to 1.72, I did three things that were completely different from most people:
First, check on-chain fund flows. Although there are $5.6 million in cash outflows from the spot market, three large whale addresses continued accumulating within the 1.70-1.73 price range, with a buy-in volume of about $8.2 million. More importantly, all these funds flowed into staking contracts, indicating this is not exchange dumping but long-term holders positioning.
Second, hedge against market panic. By monitoring trending keywords across the entire network, I found that negative keywords like "cut losses" and "zeroed out" surged over 30%. This precisely indicates that market sentiment has reached an extreme, and the energy for a rebound is building.
The key to bottom-fishing is whether you can identify genuine bottom signals rather than being fooled by superficial price figures.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTherapist
· 5h ago
Alright, another self-cultivation article from an on-chain whale... But I have to admit, the whale's accumulation strategy is indeed brilliant. Retail investors are still looking at RSI, while I've already looked at the flow. That's how the gap is created.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 5h ago
On-chain data doesn't lie, RSI has fooled me three times haha
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 5h ago
Bro, this on-chain analysis is indeed top-notch, but I have to be honest—most people simply can't understand it, and luck still plays a big role.
Just watching whale accumulation isn't enough; you need to keep up with the rhythm.
23.8% is good, but next time don't boast too much, it could backfire.
I need to learn more about on-chain data; things like RSI are really becoming less and less effective.
You're right, but I'm just worried it might be another "systematic strategy" that gets liquidated at the end of the month.
I don't know if you're doing real trading or just post-analysis, but your courage is definitely enough.
I need to ponder this approach, but I feel like it still needs to be combined with market sentiment.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 5h ago
Honestly, on-chain data reads are more fragrant than candlestick charts... You can even sniff out whale accumulation, I'm impressed.
View OriginalReply0
wind
· 5h ago
1.69-1.86, just noise
View OriginalReply0
HallucinationGrower
· 5h ago
On-chain data is the real deal; candlestick indicators should have been discarded long ago.
---
It's that same "whale building positions" story—does it ever make sense?
---
People who rush in when RSI is oversold really should reflect on their trading logic.
---
Inflow into staking contracts can indeed indicate something, but this isn't exactly a new trick, right?
---
I just want to know, how can we confirm that on-chain data isn't just machine-generated fake orders?
---
Making two-thirds of a 23.8% profit for free sounds... a bit suspicious.
---
That said, most people still emotionally cut losses; they can't see more on the chain.
---
Compared to candlestick charts, I now pay more attention to whale movements, but it's quite difficult to execute.
---
Extreme emotions = rebound energy accumulation. I agree with this logic, but timing the execution is very tricky.
---
Every time someone talks about reverse trading, they make a profit; I've never heard anyone say they lost.
Last night, when DOT dropped to 1.69, the market discussion forums were filled with voices like "Breaking new lows, this is really the end." But I was doing the opposite—adding $5,000 during this panic moment, not with a reckless all-in gambler approach, but with a systematic strategy specifically designed to target bottom rebounds. This morning, when DOT hit 1.86, my account showed the strategy was complete, with a total profit of +23.8%. Even more interesting, only one-third of these profits came from the price increase itself; the rest were gained through on-chain structural analysis and white-hat opportunities.
Many people often buy the dip halfway up the mountain, and the key reason is—they only look at candlestick indicators.
Ordinary retail investors see DOT's RSI entering oversold territory and rush in eagerly, often getting trapped in a "downtrend continuation." Why is that? Because true bottom signals are not drawn by technical indicators but are determined by large on-chain transfers and liquidity pool game theory.
When DOT fell to 1.72, I did three things that were completely different from most people:
First, check on-chain fund flows. Although there are $5.6 million in cash outflows from the spot market, three large whale addresses continued accumulating within the 1.70-1.73 price range, with a buy-in volume of about $8.2 million. More importantly, all these funds flowed into staking contracts, indicating this is not exchange dumping but long-term holders positioning.
Second, hedge against market panic. By monitoring trending keywords across the entire network, I found that negative keywords like "cut losses" and "zeroed out" surged over 30%. This precisely indicates that market sentiment has reached an extreme, and the energy for a rebound is building.
The key to bottom-fishing is whether you can identify genuine bottom signals rather than being fooled by superficial price figures.