This project is worth long-term attention. The 5% token burn mechanism demonstrates the project's genuine attitude, and the creative idea is quite interesting—combining two popular narratives into a meme coin. This kind of cross-border integration approach can indeed attract community attention nowadays. From a mechanism perspective, the burn model can effectively control the circulating supply, which is beneficial to holders in the long run.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractTearjerker
· 5h ago
We've seen quite a few destruction mechanisms before, but this combination method is actually quite interesting. I'm a bit looking forward to how it will be played out next.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 5h ago
A 5% burn sounds good, but I'm worried it might end up being just another worthless coin in the end.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 5h ago
The burn mechanism receives positive reviews, but I'm just worried it's another tactic to cut the leeks again.
---
Mixing two narratives... It's creatively called, but poorly put, it's just riding the hype. Let's see how it performs later.
---
A 5% burn sounds good, but how many projects can actually implement it?
---
Cross-industry integration of meme coins does tend to attract attention, but I don't know how long it will last.
---
Controlling the circulating supply is indeed beneficial to holders, but the premise is that someone has to buy, haha.
---
I've seen too many ideas like this before; the key still depends on whether the team is reliable.
---
The burn model is indeed good in the long run, but I'm just worried they'll change their stance halfway.
---
It feels like every project claims to be genuine, but trust depends on their actions.
---
Putting two popular narratives together—Is this creativity or just not knowing what to choose?
---
Controlling the circulation well is good, but it all depends on whether there's real determination to follow through.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 5h ago
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but how many meme coins can actually survive? Let's see what kind of sparks these two narratives can ignite.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 5h ago
I feel like the burn mechanism is a bit useless; 5% can't really control the circulation volume.
This project is worth long-term attention. The 5% token burn mechanism demonstrates the project's genuine attitude, and the creative idea is quite interesting—combining two popular narratives into a meme coin. This kind of cross-border integration approach can indeed attract community attention nowadays. From a mechanism perspective, the burn model can effectively control the circulating supply, which is beneficial to holders in the long run.