A recent research paper (arXiv:2512.20489) has unveiled a high-dimensional quantum blockchain solution based on time entanglement technology. In simple terms, it adds a physical-level lock to the blockchain—so even if large-scale quantum computers become a reality, on-chain assets can still be protected at a physical level. Although it will take time to reach true commercial application, this breakthrough indeed addresses the long-standing quantum threat that has troubled the crypto community, and is undoubtedly good news for the on-chain ecosystem valued in the trillions of dollars.



This is where Avalanche (AVAX) comes into play. This public chain has long been known for its subnetwork architecture, making it the preferred platform for traditional financial institutions and tech labs to test cutting-edge directions such as quantum defenses and RWA. AVAX has consistently maintained high contract holdings, with clear advantages in both security and innovative narratives. In the current asset allocation logic that emphasizes a sense of "future" and "ultimate security," besides Ethereum, AVAX is probably the most representative option for the development direction of blockchain infrastructure.
AVAX-0,39%
ETH1,98%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainFortuneTellervip
· 8h ago
Quantum protection sounds good in theory, but the implementation still has to wait... However, the AVAX approach is indeed interesting; playing with subnet architecture is definitely more skillful than others.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.ethvip
· 8h ago
I've heard several rounds of the quantum encryption story, but the key still depends on the landing timetable; otherwise, it's all talk and no action. ngl AVAX this wave of narrative can indeed be effective, but does anyone really use the subnet stuff? Another story about "physical-level protection"—when will the crypto world change this kind of flaw? Quantum entanglement technology sounds high-end, but honestly, it's still a gamble on whether technological progress can outpace quantum threats. Does holding a large amount of AVAX mean it's safe? I didn't quite understand that logic. Commercial use still needs time to refine, so let's talk again in two years—first, see if there are any real test cases.
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachinevip
· 8h ago
Quantum entanglement protection sounds powerful, but when it will actually be implemented remains a question mark.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainArchaeologistvip
· 8h ago
Time entanglement lock prevention? It sounds so mysterious, but it's better to first solidify the existing security measures. AVAX is indeed moving quickly in experimental directions, but there's a huge gap between commercial implementation and hype.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detectivevip
· 8h ago
Quantum protection really needs to be taken seriously, but on the other hand, how long do we have to wait for commercial use? AVAX is just riding the hype wave this time, right?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)