Don't be fooled by the Polymarket leaderboard; those accounts with 70% or 80% win rates aren't as impressive as they seem
I admit, I was attracted to it at first too.
When I opened the Polymarket leaderboard, the top few accounts had eye-catching success rates—70%, 80% success rates flooding the screen, with account names that looked highly professional, resembling the work of a quantitative team. The comments section was even more provocative:
"Smart money has already entered" "This is a probability game, not gambling" "This is an information advantage; those who got in early are making money"
But after watching the data for a few months, I realized: the win rate leaderboard is like a funhouse mirror.
**How terrible is survivor bias?**
The accounts shown on the leaderboard are just the survivors. How many accounts were eliminated due to consecutive losses? You can't see that. If 1,000 people bet randomly, some will hit over 70% success repeatedly—this isn't intelligence, it's the magic of probability itself.
**The truth about 50% win rates**
Over a longer timeline, those once-successful accounts usually can't last long. Their win rates tend to revert to around 50%—no different from flipping a coin. Some accounts can maintain a 55%-60% success rate, but that small advantage is completely eaten up by trading fees and slippage.
**Data can be deceptive**
The leaderboard is most misleading when considering the time dimension. An 80% success rate last week and an 80% success rate last month are two completely different things. New accounts, small capital, short-term trading—these can quickly produce impressive numbers. But what truly matters is long-term stability, and long-term stability is precisely where problems are most likely to be exposed.
**Why do some people still make money?**
Yes, but that's due to good information sensitivity and risk management, not some black technology. Early entry into a political event market, quick reaction to news, controlling individual positions—these advantages anyone can learn, as long as they have discipline.
**Bottom-line advice**
You can look at the leaderboard, but don't copy trades blindly. Find accounts that have been around for more than two years and have controlled drawdowns reasonably well, and observe their decision-making logic—this is 100 times better than blindly copying. Also, market prediction itself is full of uncertainty; no matter how high an account's win rate is, your risk tolerance and capital management are the biggest variables.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
mev_me_maybe
· 01-08 11:56
Survivor bias is truly incredible; leaderboards are just tombstones of survivors.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 01-07 06:31
80% win rate? Buddy, just keep climbing the leaderboard for a few more months and you'll understand—it's just survivor bias messing around.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-07 00:10
Survivor bias is indeed a trap; among 1,000 gamblers, there are always a few lucky ones, but that's called luck, not skill.
---
Honestly, I looked at the leaderboard two years ago, but I’ve deleted it now. Looking at that data just adds to my frustration.
---
When supply lines are cut, no matter how good the tactics are, they’re useless. Places like Polymarket often have high win rates because they’ve never seen a real drawdown.
---
80% in the short term, 50% in the long term—this pattern is just like market cycles; you can't escape it.
---
Those who profit from copying trades are just playing with psychological accounts. A slight misstep in risk management and everything gets wiped out. Maybe it's better to give up.
---
Only accounts that have been active for over two years are worth watching; the rest are just noise. Don’t be fooled by pretty K-lines.
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 01-05 12:26
Coins can also have a 70% win rate, as long as the sample size is small enough.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 01-05 12:18
The funny mirror ranking really is misleading; I was scammed once too. Now I only look at accounts with over two years of activity.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 01-05 12:18
The survivor bias has long been understood; now the leaderboard is just a harvesting machine for rookies.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 01-05 12:14
Both sides of the coin are pretty much the same, so why bother staring at the leaderboard and messing around?
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 01-05 12:11
Survivorship bias is really amazing, just like the story of casino winners.
Don't be fooled by the Polymarket leaderboard; those accounts with 70% or 80% win rates aren't as impressive as they seem
I admit, I was attracted to it at first too.
When I opened the Polymarket leaderboard, the top few accounts had eye-catching success rates—70%, 80% success rates flooding the screen, with account names that looked highly professional, resembling the work of a quantitative team. The comments section was even more provocative:
"Smart money has already entered"
"This is a probability game, not gambling"
"This is an information advantage; those who got in early are making money"
But after watching the data for a few months, I realized: the win rate leaderboard is like a funhouse mirror.
**How terrible is survivor bias?**
The accounts shown on the leaderboard are just the survivors. How many accounts were eliminated due to consecutive losses? You can't see that. If 1,000 people bet randomly, some will hit over 70% success repeatedly—this isn't intelligence, it's the magic of probability itself.
**The truth about 50% win rates**
Over a longer timeline, those once-successful accounts usually can't last long. Their win rates tend to revert to around 50%—no different from flipping a coin. Some accounts can maintain a 55%-60% success rate, but that small advantage is completely eaten up by trading fees and slippage.
**Data can be deceptive**
The leaderboard is most misleading when considering the time dimension. An 80% success rate last week and an 80% success rate last month are two completely different things. New accounts, small capital, short-term trading—these can quickly produce impressive numbers. But what truly matters is long-term stability, and long-term stability is precisely where problems are most likely to be exposed.
**Why do some people still make money?**
Yes, but that's due to good information sensitivity and risk management, not some black technology. Early entry into a political event market, quick reaction to news, controlling individual positions—these advantages anyone can learn, as long as they have discipline.
**Bottom-line advice**
You can look at the leaderboard, but don't copy trades blindly. Find accounts that have been around for more than two years and have controlled drawdowns reasonably well, and observe their decision-making logic—this is 100 times better than blindly copying. Also, market prediction itself is full of uncertainty; no matter how high an account's win rate is, your risk tolerance and capital management are the biggest variables.