The creator economy is evolving, but we need to distinguish between two very different player types in these emerging capital markets.
First, there are actual creators—people who build things, develop ideas, contribute real value to their communities. They're involved for the long haul, invested in what they're creating because it reflects their vision and effort.
Then there are those riding the hype wave. They accumulate tokens or projects not to support something meaningful, but purely as exit points. Their playbook is simple: amplify, attract retail attention, then dump when the price spikes. They're not stakeholders; they're extractors.
Creator capital markets thrive when incentives align with actual production and engagement. When influencers dominate these spaces just to pump and profit, the entire ecosystem suffers. Projects attract speculators instead of supporters. Communities collapse post-exit.
The real opportunity lies in building markets that reward genuine creators and their authentic followers—people who see token ownership as participation in something they believe in, not just a quick flip. That's where sustainable value actually emerges.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetScholar
· 13h ago
That's right. Currently, Web3 is indeed a mixed bag, and genuine creators are overwhelmed by those air projects.
Honestly, I'm tired of those accounts that keep shouting signals all day long, then turn around and run.
The key is whether there's consistent output; just hype is outdated.
This is the right path. Only with a real community can it last a long time.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 13h ago
Laughing and losing this one, really, you’re so right
---
Another perfect textbook of pump and dump, we these leek farmers are just here to be the cannon fodder
---
Distinguishing between creators and cash machines? Bro, are you writing a science fiction novel?
---
Trust me, those who truly believe in long-term holding are mostly on the road to losing money
---
Sustainable value? First ask those project teams who went to zero overnight what they think
---
Making quick money and building projects, is there no intersection? These are two parallel lines
---
Wow, this is exposing that we retail investors are just being cut and exploited
---
Creator economy is just a sieve; those who leak out are the true believers
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 13h ago
Looking at on-chain data, it's clear that those so-called "creators" have long been building positions and dumping. Retail investors are still shouting "keep going." Capital flow can't be fooled.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 14h ago
That's right. The early internet art communities were hollowed out in this way, and genuine creators couldn't survive.
The creator economy is evolving, but we need to distinguish between two very different player types in these emerging capital markets.
First, there are actual creators—people who build things, develop ideas, contribute real value to their communities. They're involved for the long haul, invested in what they're creating because it reflects their vision and effort.
Then there are those riding the hype wave. They accumulate tokens or projects not to support something meaningful, but purely as exit points. Their playbook is simple: amplify, attract retail attention, then dump when the price spikes. They're not stakeholders; they're extractors.
Creator capital markets thrive when incentives align with actual production and engagement. When influencers dominate these spaces just to pump and profit, the entire ecosystem suffers. Projects attract speculators instead of supporters. Communities collapse post-exit.
The real opportunity lies in building markets that reward genuine creators and their authentic followers—people who see token ownership as participation in something they believe in, not just a quick flip. That's where sustainable value actually emerges.