SNIFT vs MANA: A Comparative Analysis of Two Emerging Blockchain Protocols

Introduction: SNIFT vs MANA Investment Comparison

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between StarryNift (SNIFT) and Decentraland (MANA) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.

StarryNift (SNIFT): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its AI-powered co-creation platform that transforms virtual experiences.

Decentraland (MANA): Launched in 2017, it has been hailed as a pioneering virtual world platform based on blockchain technology, and is one of the most widely traded metaverse tokens globally.

This article will provide a comprehensive analysis of the investment value comparison between SNIFT and MANA, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

SNIFT (Coin A) and MANA (Coin B) Historical Price Trends

• 2025: SNIFT reached its all-time high of $0.13 on September 26, 2024, but has since experienced a significant decline.
• 2021: MANA surged to its all-time high of $5.85 on November 25, 2021, during the peak of the crypto bull market.
• Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, SNIFT dropped from its high of $0.13 to a low of $0.0004175, while MANA declined from $5.85 to its current price of $0.2319, showing a more severe percentage drop for SNIFT.

Current Market Situation (2025-11-02)

• SNIFT current price: $0.0004423
• MANA current price: $0.2319
• 24-hour trading volume: SNIFT $16,590.87 vs MANA $154,661.98
• Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 33 (Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

• View SNIFT current price Market Price
• View MANA current price Market Price

II. Core Factors Affecting SNIFT vs MANA Investment Value

Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)

• MANA: Trading at over 90% below its all-time high, making it currently affordable compared to historical prices
• SNIFT: Information not provided in the reference materials
• 📌 Historical Pattern: Supply mechanisms' impact on price cycles not specified in the reference materials.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

• Institutional Holdings: Information not provided in the reference materials
• Enterprise Adoption: MANA grants users control over all virtual assets in Decentraland's metaverse
• Regulatory Attitudes: Hong Kong's "Stablecoin Ordinance (Draft)" coming in May 2025 may impact the broader crypto market, including metaverse tokens

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

• MANA Technical Development: Associated with Decentraland, one of the most popular metaverse projects in the cryptocurrency space
• SNIFT Technical Development: Information not provided in the reference materials
• Ecosystem Comparison: Decentraland's metaverse land plots attracted significant investment during previous bull markets

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

• Performance in Inflationary Environments: Information not provided in the reference materials
• Macroeconomic Monetary Policy: US-China trade tensions and economic data may influence broader crypto markets
• Geopolitical Factors: Information not provided in the reference materials

III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: SNIFT vs MANA

Short-term Prediction (2025)

• SNIFT: Conservative $0.000376295 - $0.0004427 | Optimistic $0.000473689
• MANA: Conservative $0.1856 - $0.232 | Optimistic $0.34104

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

• SNIFT may enter a growth phase, with an estimated price range of $0.000468389327625 - $0.0007106596695
• MANA may enter a growth phase, with an estimated price range of $0.22176648 - $0.36653071
• Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

• SNIFT: Base scenario $0.000855716075615 | Optimistic scenario $0.000984073486958
• MANA: Base scenario $0.465567307842 | Optimistic scenario $0.56333644248882

View detailed price predictions for SNIFT and MANA

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

SNIFT:

MANA:

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: SNIFT vs MANA

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

• SNIFT: Suitable for investors interested in AI-powered co-creation platforms and virtual experiences
• MANA: Suitable for investors focused on established metaverse projects and virtual world platforms

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

• Conservative investors: SNIFT: 20% vs MANA: 80%
• Aggressive investors: SNIFT: 40% vs MANA: 60%
• Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risks

• SNIFT: Higher volatility, less liquidity, and potential for significant price swings
• MANA: Susceptible to overall crypto market trends and metaverse sector sentiment

Technical Risks

• SNIFT: Scalability, network stability
• MANA: Decentraland platform adoption, technical upgrades

Regulatory Risks

• Global regulatory policies may impact both tokens, with potential for stricter oversight on metaverse and virtual asset platforms

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

• SNIFT advantages: Newer project with potential for growth, AI-powered co-creation platform
• MANA advantages: Established metaverse project, wider adoption, higher liquidity

✅ Investment Advice:

• New investors: Consider a smaller allocation to MANA as an introduction to metaverse tokens
• Experienced investors: Balanced portfolio of both SNIFT and MANA, with a higher weight on MANA
• Institutional investors: Focus on MANA due to its established market position and liquidity

⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the main differences between SNIFT and MANA? A: SNIFT is an AI-powered co-creation platform for virtual experiences, while MANA is associated with Decentraland, an established metaverse project. MANA has a longer history, higher liquidity, and wider adoption, whereas SNIFT is a newer project with potential for growth.

Q2: Which token has performed better in terms of price history? A: MANA has shown better overall performance. While SNIFT reached its all-time high of $0.13 in September 2024, it has since experienced a significant decline. MANA reached its all-time high of $5.85 in November 2021 and, although it has declined, it has maintained a higher relative value.

Q3: How do the current market situations of SNIFT and MANA compare? A: As of November 2, 2025, SNIFT's price is $0.0004423 with a 24-hour trading volume of $16,590.87, while MANA's price is $0.2319 with a 24-hour trading volume of $154,661.98. MANA shows significantly higher liquidity and trading activity.

Q4: What are the price predictions for SNIFT and MANA in 2030? A: For SNIFT, the base scenario predicts $0.000855716075615, with an optimistic scenario of $0.000984073486958. For MANA, the base scenario predicts $0.465567307842, with an optimistic scenario of $0.56333644248882.

Q5: How should investors allocate their portfolio between SNIFT and MANA? A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to SNIFT and 80% to MANA, while more aggressive investors could opt for 40% SNIFT and 60% MANA. The exact allocation should depend on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.

Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in SNIFT and MANA? A: Both tokens face market risks related to crypto volatility. SNIFT has higher volatility and less liquidity, while MANA is more susceptible to overall crypto market trends. Technical risks include scalability issues for SNIFT and platform adoption challenges for MANA. Both face potential regulatory risks as global policies on virtual assets evolve.

Q7: Which token is recommended for different types of investors? A: New investors might consider a smaller allocation to MANA as an introduction to metaverse tokens. Experienced investors could maintain a balanced portfolio of both SNIFT and MANA, with a higher weight on MANA. Institutional investors may focus more on MANA due to its established market position and liquidity.