
The annualized average return formula is a method to convert returns from any holding period into a standardized “annual rate of return.” This enables direct comparisons across different timeframes, such as 7 days, 3 months, or 300 days.
Intuitively, you can think of returns as “how your money grows over various lengths of time.” Annualization answers: If this growth continued for a full year, what would the equivalent percentage gain be?
The most common annualized average return formula relies on the concepts of geometric mean and compounding. For a single investment with no cash flows:
Step 1: Calculate the total return:
Total Return = Ending Value ÷ Beginning Value − 1
Step 2: Convert the holding period to years:
Years = Holding Days ÷ 365 (or actual days ÷ 365; leap years have minimal effect)
Step 3: Apply the annualized average return formula:
Annualized Average Return = (1 + Total Return)^(1 ÷ Years) − 1
Example: Suppose you hold an asset for 300 days, and its value rises from 1,000 to 1,300. Total return = 30%. Years = 300/365 ≈ 0.82. Annualized average return ≈ 1.3^(1/0.82) − 1 ≈ 37.5%. This means stretching this 300-day result to a full year would equate to about a 37.5% annual return.
For multiple periods (such as monthly or quarterly returns), first multiply the returns for each period:
Cumulative Growth Factor = ∏(1 + Period Return),
then annualize using the number of years:
Annualized Average Return = (Cumulative Growth Factor)^(1 ÷ Years) − 1
The annualized average return formula uses the geometric mean instead of the arithmetic mean. The geometric mean involves “multiplying and taking roots,” matching the compounding nature of asset returns. The arithmetic mean simply sums and divides by the number of periods, which tends to overstate real compounded results, especially when returns are volatile.
Example: Two-year returns are +50% and −30%. Cumulative growth factor = 1.5 × 0.7 = 1.05. Geometric annualized return ≈ (1.05)^(1/2) − 1 ≈ 2.5% per year; arithmetic average is (50% − 30%) / 2 = 10% per year, which clearly overestimates the true return. The greater the volatility, the more pronounced this gap—often called “volatility drag.”
If there are cash inflows or outflows during the investment period, using only the basic annualized average return formula will mix in the impact of those flows, requiring a distinction between two approaches:
In practice:
Step 1: If there are no or negligible cash flows, use the annualized average return formula.
Step 2: For multiple deposits/redemptions, use IRR (for regular intervals) or XIRR (for irregular intervals) functions, inputting each cash flow’s date and amount.
Step 3: To assess strategy skill, use time-weighted returns by segmenting periods, chaining their returns together, and then annualizing.
APR refers to a non-compounded annual interest rate—essentially a “nominal rate.” APY includes compounding, reflecting the effect of reinvesting interest. The annualized average return formula converts actual or projected total returns into an annual rate and is conceptually closer to APY.
Example: For a product with a 10% APR, if compounded daily, APY ≈ (1 + 0.10/365)^365 − 1 ≈ 10.52%; if compounded weekly, APY ≈ (1 + 0.10/52)^52 − 1 ≈ 10.47%. In lending and yield products, comparing APR and APY with the annualized average return formula helps standardize different products and strategies (as of January 2026, most DeFi protocols display yields as APY).
When staking, participating in liquidity mining, running spot grid bots, or executing quantitative strategies, it is common to convert short-term returns into an annualized rate for comparison:
Note that annualization assumes “the rate of generating returns can be maintained.” Actual results will depend on volatility, slippage, fees, and capital size—so review multiple periods for more robust conclusions.
For Gate’s financial products and strategy tools:
Step 1: Identify product metrics. On Gate Earn and similar pages, check whether rates are labeled APR or APY; if APR is shown and auto-compounding is supported, convert APR to APY according to compounding frequency to compare with the annualized average return formula.
Step 2: Record cash flows. Download or organize your subscription/redemption and payout records (including fees), for later IRR/XIRR or time-weighted calculations.
Step 3: Choose your approach. If evaluating strategy skill, use time-weighted returns chained and then annualized; if focusing on personal experience, use XIRR for money-weighted returns.
Step 4: Review and compare results. Contrast your calculated results with platform-displayed APR/APY, explain discrepancies (compounding frequency, fees, idle periods, slippage), and make horizontal comparisons across similar products.
All capital-related actions carry risk—evaluate product terms, liquidity, and volatility before making decisions.
Typical mistakes include:
On risks: High volatility amplifies discrepancies between short-period and annualized results; costs from leverage or rebalancing strategies—including slippage and liquidation risk—may widen gaps between “expected” and “realized” annualized returns.
The core of the annualized average return formula is applying geometric averaging and compounding so that different timeframes can be compared fairly on an annual basis. For multiple periods or irregular cash flows, switch to time-weighted or money-weighted (IRR/XIRR) methods as appropriate for your evaluation goal. In crypto and wealth management applications, always consider APR/APY conventions, compounding frequency, fees, liquidity constraints—and validate your results across multiple intervals. Keeping detailed records and following standardized calculations can greatly improve your understanding of performance and your decision-making quality.
Simple division only works for basic cases; in reality, investment gains grow due to compounding effects. The annualized average return formula accurately reflects how fast your capital grows—especially when investment periods are less than one year or extend over several years. For example: If you invest $100, earn $20 in year one (ending at $120), then earn $24 in year two (ending at $144), the formula shows an annualized return of 19.54%, not simply (44/100)/2 = 22%.
Gate usually displays annual yield percentages; you should check both the calculation base and time period. On staking product details pages, confirm whether rates are based on current or historical average prices—and note any possible project adjustments. It’s best to verify using the annualized average return formula: Select past complete cycle data, calculate actual token value growth, and if your result differs from the published rate by more than 5%, exercise caution.
A negative annualized return means your investment lost value when calculated on an annual basis. This doesn’t necessarily mean failure—crypto markets are volatile and short-term losses are common. The key is to analyze why you lost money: Was it due to overall market decline? A specific token’s poor performance? A portfolio adjustment? Or genuine risk exposure? Check annualized returns across multiple periods rather than relying on a single data point.
Annualized return is just one indicator—it’s not a sole basis for investing all your funds. Higher yields often come with higher risks—for example, staking smaller tokens or joining new liquidity mining projects. Consider project risk levels, your liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and portfolio allocation as part of your decision process. On Gate, always compare actual historical returns across multiple cycles using the annualized average return formula—not just headline rates.
The basic annualized average return formula isn’t suitable for irregular cash flows. In these cases, use weighted averages or Internal Rate of Return (IRR), accounting for each deposit’s timing and amount. For example: If you invest $1,000 in January, add another $1,000 in June, and withdraw at year-end—the formula must weight gains by how long each portion was invested. Gate’s fixed-term staking products usually avoid this issue; choose clear investment cycles and fixed-rate options where possible.


