The Supreme Court is now wrestling with whether Trump's tariff strategy actually holds up legally. At the heart of the debate? Whether the president can unilaterally impose sweeping trade restrictions without going through Congress first.

This isn't just a constitutional question—it's about executive power limits and how trade policy gets made. The justices seem divided on whether existing laws give the White House enough leeway to slap tariffs on trading partners, or if that crosses into legislative territory.

For anyone watching macro trends, this matters. Tariff uncertainty ripples through global markets, affects supply chains, and shifts investor sentiment across asset classes. When trade policy becomes unpredictable, risk assets tend to feel it first.

The court's eventual ruling could reshape how future administrations handle trade disputes and economic tools. We're talking about precedent that goes way beyond this specific case.