Absolutely. We're seeing certain technologies deliver productivity gains that aren't just incremental—they're multiplying human output by factors of 10x, even 100x in specific workflows. Yet here's where it gets messy: whether this shift deserves celebration or resistance? That's entirely speculative territory.



People's stance on this tends to track pretty neatly along their political beliefs. Some see exponential efficiency as progress worth embracing. Others view it as a threat demanding pushback. Neither camp has definitive proof their worldview will age well—it's all educated guesses dressed up as certainty.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CountdownToBrokevip
· 11-13 22:00
Will efficiency really cause unemployment? Wake up.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClickvip
· 11-13 18:55
Even a technical bull has to depend on how people use it.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinTherapistvip
· 11-13 17:19
What's the point of talking so much? Aren't people still people?
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlinvip
· 11-11 06:21
Stop arguing, everyone is just guessing about the future.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 11-11 06:18
I, with a Full Position in AI, am trapped at the historical high point again.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 11-11 06:17
You're just here singing bullish and bearish, huh?
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForevervip
· 11-11 05:55
After the core position is fully lost, do you still want to buy the top?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)