Recently noticed that Check AI has made a big move - the product mechanism has been fully upgraded.
This change is significant; the project team has directly put out 5000U as the prize pool and has prepared many peripheral gifts. The most crucial change is that they have eliminated the original "reply rate" gameplay and replaced it with a brand new "points system."
To be honest, this shift from a single indicator to a points system is quite common in many Web3 projects. Response rates can be easily manipulated, but a well-designed points system can provide a more comprehensive assessment of user contributions.
However, how the specific points are calculated and how the weights are distributed will depend on the subsequent rules. A 5000U pool is not small; if the threshold is reasonable, early participants should be able to reap considerable rewards.
The project team is currently promoting new gameplay in the community. Those interested can follow their official channels, as the details of the rules are still being refined.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTrooper
· 11-21 10:36
Another points system, the schemes are getting more and more complicated.
---
5000U sounds pretty tempting, but I’m just afraid that when the rules come out, it’ll be all sorts of tricky gimmicks again.
---
Switching the reply rate to a points system seems okay to me, at least it won’t be so spammy anymore.
---
Those who got in early can definitely reap the benefits, but you have to act before the rules are set in stone.
---
The ones who really understand how to play are always the top accounts. The rest of us are just here to watch.
---
Let’s wait until the detailed rules are released. Most of the people jumping in now are just cannon fodder.
---
Check the official channels, don’t get scammed by shady groups.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalyst
· 11-19 22:02
The 5000U prize pool sounds nice, but have you looked closely at the weight distribution? Generally, such reforms are a precursor to the market maker playing people for suckers.
A well-designed points system can indeed identify real users, but the question is, will the project party be so generous? I bet fifty cents that they've already left themselves a big chunk.
Don't rush to enter a position before the rules are announced; history tells us that the more mysterious the mechanism, the more it tricks people.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 11-19 06:40
Another change in the game, the tricks are deep, let’s first take a look at the rules.
The point system sounds good, but I’m afraid it’s just another way to Be Played for Suckers.
A 5000U prize pool is not small, but those who make money in the early stages are always insiders.
Wait a minute, could this time also be the kind where the data looks good but the money received is pitifully little?
Has anyone tried it? Can you really trap the bonuses or is it just another pie in the sky?
View OriginalReply0
MEVSupportGroup
· 11-18 19:41
It's the points system again, the traps are all the same, we still have to see how the weights are distributed.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 11-18 19:37
The mechanism has changed again... I've seen this trick too many times, in the end it's just changing the soup without changing the medicine.
The points system sounds sophisticated, but in reality, it's just redefining the way of "割韭菜".
The 5000U prize pool looks substantial, but when divided among thousands of people, it's barely worth mentioning, so don't think too much about it.
The early participants' bonuses? History will repeat itself; the real harvesting moment is when the rules are fully operational.
In short, the project party is just patching things up during the low cycle, merely creating an illusion of hope for the survivors.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 11-18 19:34
The points system sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just the same old thing in a new package. I've seen too many upgrades like this.
---
The 5000U prize pool really depends on the distribution rules; if the threshold isn’t transparent, it’s all just empty talk.
---
I agree that response rates can be easily inflated, but the points system needs to actually have real value, otherwise it will just be a hassle.
---
Early participants can indeed benefit, but the premise is that this mechanism doesn’t change three times again.
---
Let’s wait and see what the community says; it’s not too late to follow the trend after someone reaps the rewards.
---
I’m actually more cautious about such major upgrades, which usually indicates that there are loopholes in the previous gameplay.
---
The key is weight distribution; otherwise, high-engagement users will still be at a disadvantage.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 11-18 19:30
Wait, how is the points calculated? It wasn't clear.
Changing reply rates to points? I've seen this trick a lot, the key is how the weights are distributed.
5000U is indeed a lot, but if the threshold is too high, it's useless.
Can early entrants make money, or is it just another old trick of playing people for suckers?
Pushing this without finalizing the rules seems a bit rushed.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidator
· 11-18 19:21
The 5000U pool is indeed not small, but what I care about most is how the point weighting is distributed, so it doesn't become a malicious swiping paradise.
Entering early can indeed reap benefits; it just depends on whether the rules have pitfalls.
The reply rate can easily be cheated, and this point has been improved, but we'll have to see if the new system design works.
The point system sounds good, but I'm afraid it will turn into another form of trap.
The 5000U prize pool sounds impressive, but I don't know how many people it will be divided among.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxiety
· 11-18 19:19
The points system trap is back again. To put it bluntly, it all depends on how the rules are set.
5000U is indeed not a small amount, but we have to wait for the details to see if the threshold is truly low or just seemingly low.
What happened to the early adopters who rushed in?
The biggest fear with changing mechanisms is data being cleared; then we have to start from zero again.
It feels like every upgrade is like this, first making promises and then talking.
Recently noticed that Check AI has made a big move - the product mechanism has been fully upgraded.
This change is significant; the project team has directly put out 5000U as the prize pool and has prepared many peripheral gifts. The most crucial change is that they have eliminated the original "reply rate" gameplay and replaced it with a brand new "points system."
To be honest, this shift from a single indicator to a points system is quite common in many Web3 projects. Response rates can be easily manipulated, but a well-designed points system can provide a more comprehensive assessment of user contributions.
However, how the specific points are calculated and how the weights are distributed will depend on the subsequent rules. A 5000U pool is not small; if the threshold is reasonable, early participants should be able to reap considerable rewards.
The project team is currently promoting new gameplay in the community. Those interested can follow their official channels, as the details of the rules are still being refined.