Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

The traditional financial market has a classic saying: buying stocks is buying a company.



But what's the truth? Does the company really treat you as a shareholder with that stock certificate in your hand?😏

Reality is harsh - there's a wall between stocks and companies, and that wall is called the "shareholders' meeting." Retail investors' few shares can hardly influence company decisions. So smart money tends to choose those companies where "whoever becomes the boss can win easily," but if a strong CEO comes along, forget about it.

This is why RWB is more imaginative than RWA.

In the RWB model, projects like RoamFi have directly bridged the gap between cash flow and asset tokens. What you hold is not just an "investment certificate", but a real right tied to business profits.

In simple terms: RWA is tokenizing real assets, while RWB is tokenizing real business operations. In the former, you are buying asset mapping, and in the latter, you are buying the business growth itself.

Of course, this is not investment advice. Remember to DYOR(Do Your Own Research) before making any decisions.

———

**ENG:**

There's a classic saying in TradFi: buying stocks means buying the company.

But here's the reality — does the company actually recognize you as an owner? 😏

There's a wall between your stock certificate and the company, and that wall is called the "shareholders' meeting." Retail investors hold so few shares that they can't influence corporate decisions at all. That's why smart money targets companies that "run smoothly no matter who's in charge." If there's a strong CEO? Forget it.

This is exactly why RWB has more potential than RWA.

Under the RWB model, projects like RoamFi eliminate the gap between cash flow generation and the business token itself. What you hold isn't just an "investment certificate" — it's real equity tied directly to business revenue.

In short: RWA tokenizes real-world assets. RWB tokenizes real-world businesses. The former gives you an asset proxy; the latter gives you the business growth itself.

Of course, this isn't financial advice. Always DYOR before making any decisions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSauceMastervip
· 11-21 19:32
This RWB rhetoric is back again, I'm tired of hearing it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7vip
· 11-20 09:51
Retail investors are just working for institutions.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 11-19 19:51
Retail investors are really just dumb buyers; during the shareholder meeting voting, we are basically invisible. --- The RWB approach is indeed brilliant; directly talking about cash flow is much more reliable than that set of illusory asset mapping. --- To put it bluntly, the traditional stock market is just a playground for big capital; we small retail investors simply can't play. --- Projects like RoamFi can truly allow holders to share in business growth; this is what web3 should be doing. --- Stocks are just an illusion, making you think you have a say, but in reality, you've long been trapped. --- Finally, someone has clarified the difference between RWA and RWB; business tokenization is indeed more tangible. --- In front of a strong CEO, aren't retail investors' stocks just pieces of paper? Hilarious. --- Seeing RWB reminds me that this is how true tokenomics should look. --- This is my reason for entering Web3: to break free from the hypocritical game rules of TradFi. --- The era of holding all shareholder decision-making power in one hand is over; now we must rely on the business itself.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 11-19 19:43
rwb sounds good but I'm still skeptical
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNutvip
· 11-19 19:34
Now I finally understand, RWB is the real deal --- Retail investors are doomed to be played for suckers, I've seen through it long ago --- To put it bluntly, it's about the ROI issue; business returns are more tangible than asset appreciation --- RoamFi's logic indeed bypasses intermediaries, but who bears the risk? --- Cash flow binding > asset mapping, I agree with this order --- Finally, someone has poked through this layer of glass --- So it's said that one must do their own research and not just listen to stories --- In the RWB model, retail investors are no longer just holders of certificates, which is interesting --- Is there such a big difference between asset tokenization and business tokenization? --- I just want to know how long this RoamFi setup can last
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandlesvip
· 11-19 19:34
rwb is indeed wild, retail investors can finally get a share of the pie.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhalevip
· 11-19 19:30
This logic of rwb indeed broke my understanding of rwa.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)