The on-chain world has been exploring one question: how can users truly own their own data without sacrificing the transparency of the system? Data sovereignty and openness and transparency—these two seemingly contradictory concepts—might be able to find a balance point within a decentralized architecture.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 11-25 11:12

Sounds nice, but what about reality? Can decentralized architecture really solve these two contradictions? I don't think so.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 11-23 16:09

Sounds great, but has it really been implemented? I see that most projects are still playing conceptual games.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 11-23 12:15

Easier said than done... Data sovereignty has been hyped in Web3 for so long, but everyone is still doing their own thing.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 11-23 05:07

To put it bluntly, it's still the same old story. How many projects have actually been implemented? Anyone can shout slogans.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaBrain

· 11-23 05:07

Sounds good in theory, but how does it actually work? A bunch of projects are bragging about data sovereignty, but everything is transparent on-chain, so what about privacy?

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 11-23 05:00

Well said, but what about reality? Most projects are still just hyping things up, and very few actually achieve true data sovereignty.

View OriginalReply0

Rugman_Walking