Abstract Chain just rolled out something pretty clever - they're now sorting games into skill-based versus luck-based categories. Finally, someone's making it easier to find what you're actually looking for.
Take Gigaverse for instance. It sits in the skill-based section because your performance actually matters there, no random number generators dictating your fate. This kind of categorization feels overdue honestly. Too many platforms just dump everything together and call it a day.
It's a small change but could shift how people discover games in the Web3 space. When you know upfront whether a game rewards practice or just prayers to RNG gods, picking becomes way less of a gamble itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryingOldWallet
· 11-26 18:36
The old wallet has cried out:
After playing Web3 games for so many years, someone finally thought of this... dividing skills and luck? I really get it now.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 11-26 17:21
Finally, someone did the right thing. Separating skill-based and luck-based should have happened much earlier.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 11-23 19:13
Oh my, finally someone has separated skill-based games from luck-based games. I’ve been annoyed by those messy platforms for a long time.
Skill-based games are the real deal. No need to beg the RNG goddess—it's all about true skill.
This change may be small, but it could be a major turning point for the Web3 gaming ecosystem.
Putting something like Gigaverse in the skill pool is definitely appropriate. Finally, I don’t have to try out games blindly like opening loot boxes.
Honestly, I just want to say—why didn’t anyone do this before? Such a simple classification should have existed long ago.
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 11-23 19:12
Oh my god, finally someone made this. It’s so much better than those messy platforms that just pile everything together.
Skill-based games like Gigaverse should be labeled this way. Don’t let people waste time relying on luck.
The Web3 game discovery experience definitely needs an upgrade. Now you can immediately tell whether a game is skill-based or luck-based.
This kind of classification feels long overdue, but at least it’s here now.
Actually, I just want to ask—how can those pure luck-based games retain users now?
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 11-23 19:07
Oh my god, finally someone did this, I'm really annoyed by those platforms that just pile up games.
This kind of classification should have appeared earlier, so we wouldn't have to guess for a long time whether a game is purely luck-based or really tests skills.
The example of Gigaverse is good, at least we have an idea before playing the game.
Abstract Chain just rolled out something pretty clever - they're now sorting games into skill-based versus luck-based categories. Finally, someone's making it easier to find what you're actually looking for.
Take Gigaverse for instance. It sits in the skill-based section because your performance actually matters there, no random number generators dictating your fate. This kind of categorization feels overdue honestly. Too many platforms just dump everything together and call it a day.
It's a small change but could shift how people discover games in the Web3 space. When you know upfront whether a game rewards practice or just prayers to RNG gods, picking becomes way less of a gamble itself.