Why bring this up now?

Flashback to last year's Breakpoint conference—I was deep in conversation about something that's been on my mind: Solana's architecture should theoretically support way more token functionality than we're currently seeing. The tech stack is there. The throughput handles it. Yet we're barely scratching the surface of what's technically possible with token standards and composability on this chain.

The gap between what the network can do versus what's being built? That's the conversation worth having.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityHunter

· 11-27 01:46

Ngl, the potential of Solana is right there, why can't the developers make it happen...

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 11-26 14:29

yeah ngl, the throughput was never the bottleneck here. devs just got lazy building abstractions nobody actually needs.

Reply0

SmartContractRebel

· 11-26 08:19

To be honest, the potential of Solana has really been seriously wasted... the technology has long met the conditions, so why is no one building it properly?

View OriginalReply0

EthMaximalist

· 11-24 05:06

Ngl, the potential of Solana is indeed being wasted; the tech stack is all there, but no one is using it.

View OriginalReply0

SatsStacking

· 11-24 05:00

Solana's potential has always been there, it's just that no one has truly explored it... that's the most heartbreaking part.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 11-24 04:55

Ngl, Solana is wasting its own TPS for no reason. What are the developers doing?