The crypto market just got a harsh wake-up call. On Monday, attackers drained over $120 million from Balancer—a DEX that’s been around since the early days of DeFi—by exploiting a precision rounding vulnerability in its Vault contract.
Here’s what makes this alarming: Balancer had passed 10+ audits. The vault alone was reviewed 3 times by different firms. Yet the attacker still found a way through.
The Technical Exploit
According to GoPlus Security’s analysis, the hack worked through a seemingly mundane flaw: rounding errors in swap calculations. Every operation rounded downward, gradually distorting token prices. The batchSwap function then amplified this vulnerability by allowing the attacker to chain transactions strategically. Classic precision attack—the kind security firms sometimes miss because it’s too simple to be obvious.
Balancer clarified that only V2 Composable Stable Pools were affected (not V3), and they’ve paused affected pools. But the damage was done.
The Market Reaction
The shockwave hit hard:
Market cap dropped 3.2% across major cryptocurrencies (BTC, ETH, XRP, BNB, SOL leading losses)
$1.23 billion in liquidations cascaded through derivatives markets ($1.1B long liquidations + $128.4M short liquidations)
Stakewise recovered $20M+ of stolen funds through multisig wallets, and Lookonchain tracked the attacker continuously converting ETH—but trust damage spreads faster than recovery efforts.
The Bigger Picture
Ryan Sean Adams from Bankless nailed the sentiment: “If it happened to Balancer, it can happen to anything.”
Some L1s responded aggressively—Berachain validators halted the network, Sonic prepped a freeze function. But that raised a different concern: if validators can unilaterally stop transactions, how “decentralized” is blockchain really?
This hack reveals an uncomfortable truth: audits catch obvious bugs, not edge cases. A pool being live for years doesn’t mean it’s safe—just that no one tested it the right way yet.
The DeFi community’s confidence took a hit. But it also reminded everyone: security is an ongoing process, not a one-time checkbox.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
When Audits Aren't Enough: The Balancer Hack Exposes DeFi's Blind Spot
The crypto market just got a harsh wake-up call. On Monday, attackers drained over $120 million from Balancer—a DEX that’s been around since the early days of DeFi—by exploiting a precision rounding vulnerability in its Vault contract.
Here’s what makes this alarming: Balancer had passed 10+ audits. The vault alone was reviewed 3 times by different firms. Yet the attacker still found a way through.
The Technical Exploit
According to GoPlus Security’s analysis, the hack worked through a seemingly mundane flaw: rounding errors in swap calculations. Every operation rounded downward, gradually distorting token prices. The batchSwap function then amplified this vulnerability by allowing the attacker to chain transactions strategically. Classic precision attack—the kind security firms sometimes miss because it’s too simple to be obvious.
Balancer clarified that only V2 Composable Stable Pools were affected (not V3), and they’ve paused affected pools. But the damage was done.
The Market Reaction
The shockwave hit hard:
Stakewise recovered $20M+ of stolen funds through multisig wallets, and Lookonchain tracked the attacker continuously converting ETH—but trust damage spreads faster than recovery efforts.
The Bigger Picture
Ryan Sean Adams from Bankless nailed the sentiment: “If it happened to Balancer, it can happen to anything.”
Some L1s responded aggressively—Berachain validators halted the network, Sonic prepped a freeze function. But that raised a different concern: if validators can unilaterally stop transactions, how “decentralized” is blockchain really?
This hack reveals an uncomfortable truth: audits catch obvious bugs, not edge cases. A pool being live for years doesn’t mean it’s safe—just that no one tested it the right way yet.
The DeFi community’s confidence took a hit. But it also reminded everyone: security is an ongoing process, not a one-time checkbox.