This weekend, an analytical article went viral in the English-speaking crypto community—pointing the finger directly at JPMorgan, claiming it is the mastermind behind the recent sharp drop of $BTC .
The logic of the article is quite interesting: this battle is essentially a clash between the old and new financial orders. On one side, there’s the Trump administration, the Treasury Department, and the entire crypto community, forming the “new forces” alliance; on the other, traditional banking giants have joined forces with the Federal Reserve, creating the “old guard” stronghold.
What’s even more intriguing is that the White House has yet to make a statement. Does this mean they tacitly agree with this view? Or are they waiting for prices to drop further to buy in at lower levels?
The games played in the market are never as simple as just reading candlestick charts.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MissedAirdropAgain
· 11-27 04:52
Is JPMorgan stirring up trouble again? Is it true or not? It feels like every time there's a fall, they can be linked to it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 11-27 04:24
Is JPMorgan trying to shift the blame again? I'm tired of hearing this narrative. The real issue is still the lack of market liquidity, so stop attributing everything to conspiracy theories.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpa
· 11-27 00:18
Is JPMorgan causing trouble again? I've heard this set of excuses too many times; every time there is a big dump, they have to blame it on some big shark... It's even more outrageous that the White House isn't saying anything; it feels like they are all waiting for a good price.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankrupter
· 11-24 20:05
Is JPMorgan trying to stir things up again? I think, rather than guessing what the White House is thinking, it’s better to first ask ourselves how many bullets we have left.
This game isn’t that complicated... it’s just a struggle for interests.
Low-position layout? Ha, just afraid of going bankrupt and having nothing to lay out.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 11-24 07:55
What is JPMorgan up to again... I only half believe this logic, it's even scarier that the White House is silent.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 11-24 07:44
Is it time to blame JPMorgan again? I just want to ask, why does there always have to be a "puppet master" behind every fall? Why not say it's because we played with leverage and messed it up ourselves?
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 11-24 07:41
Is JPMorgan Chase taking the blame again? Every time there is a big dump, it has to be blamed on Wall Street. This logic is a bit too convenient... However, I believe in positioning at low levels.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 11-24 07:40
Is JPMorgan taking the blame again? Every time there’s a fall, someone blames TradFi, but the crypto world is also playing it slick, haha.
The White House's silence basically means they want to pick up some bargains.
I just want to know where the bottom really is. Should I buy now or continue to hold a Short Position?
The comparison between the old and new powers seems a bit exaggerated, doesn’t it? It sounds nice to call it a grand strategy, but honestly, isn’t everyone just playing people for suckers?
To what extent does it need to dip to be the real bottom? Can someone give a number?
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 11-24 07:37
Is JPMorgan stirring up trouble again? This script is too outrageous, I'll believe half of it.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 11-24 07:31
Is JPMorgan up to something again? I feel like these traditional finance guys are getting more and more anxious... The White House playing dead is a signal, right?
This weekend, an analytical article went viral in the English-speaking crypto community—pointing the finger directly at JPMorgan, claiming it is the mastermind behind the recent sharp drop of $BTC .
The logic of the article is quite interesting: this battle is essentially a clash between the old and new financial orders. On one side, there’s the Trump administration, the Treasury Department, and the entire crypto community, forming the “new forces” alliance; on the other, traditional banking giants have joined forces with the Federal Reserve, creating the “old guard” stronghold.
What’s even more intriguing is that the White House has yet to make a statement. Does this mean they tacitly agree with this view? Or are they waiting for prices to drop further to buy in at lower levels?
The games played in the market are never as simple as just reading candlestick charts.