The Citigroup research team recently developed an interesting quantitative model - they found a clear mathematical relationship between the inflow and outflow of Bitcoin ETF funds and the price trend of coins.
How exactly is it calculated? For every $1 billion that flows out, the price of BTC is likely to retract by about 3.4%. This pattern also works in reverse: when there is a net inflow of the same amount, the increase is basically proportional. There is an analyst at Citigroup named Saunders, who based on this model directly gave a pessimistic year-end prediction—if the funding situation remains stable (that is, a zero net inflow state), the target price is seen at $82,000.
The problem is that the current situation is worse than "zero inflow." Actual data shows that the ETF has seen outflows of billions of dollars consecutively. If this trend continues, there may be further room for price correction. The market sentiment indeed needs some time to digest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VibesOverCharts
· 11-27 07:31
The Citi model sounds fairly reliable, but to be honest, the data does look a bit scary right now, with billions flowing out of the ETF continuously... this is the real problem.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 11-26 11:05
The Citigroup model feels a bit overfitted...
Continuous outflows of tens of billions really can't hold on anymore.
At this price of 82k... just wait and see.
It's all about capital flow and emotional digestion; to put it bluntly, it will fall further.
With a ratio of 3.4%, how can they be so sure?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 11-25 05:07
Citigroup's model sounds pretty tight, but the 82k prediction... I think it might be a bit conservative.
Continuous outflows of tens of billions? Is that true? Who can withstand that?
Something feels off, why do I have the feeling it's going to fall again?
A 3.4% drawdown coefficient sounds a bit too precise, can this really be used?
Even with the funds balanced, it's still this bad; in a state of outflow, it’s likely to crash again.
It's actually just waiting for institutions to buy the dip, according to this model’s deduction, there's not much suspense.
Is the continuous outflow of the ETF a close all positions? Or are large investors closing positions?
Wait, hold on, if I think about this logic in reverse... can the rise during inflows also be equalized? Isn’t that just an amplifier?
82k is just the starting point; it depends on whether anyone is catching a falling knife later.
Market digestion? The question is, who will digest this tens of billions of selling pressure?
Don't be ridiculous, Citigroup's data model is still from Citigroup; it definitely has reference value.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 11-24 16:55
Another round of model-based arguments for a drop? Citigroup just loves to play this game—the data looks good, but reality is harsh.
Big players are dumping, and even 82k is an optimistic scenario... If we really follow their formulas, there are even deeper pitfalls ahead.
Those who should have bought the dip long ago are now cutting their losses instead. That's just how this market is.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 11-24 16:43
This Citibank model sounds pretty impressive, but is it really that linear? I don't think the market is that dumb.
Billions have been flowing out consecutively, and according to their logic, BTC does have more downside... but can it really drop to 82K? That seems way too pessimistic.
The liquidity situation is tough. Right now, we're just waiting for a rebound signal.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.eth
· 11-24 16:38
Citi's analysis this time is indeed harsh, but at this price of 82k... I think it's unlikely.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collector
· 11-24 16:36
Citi's model does have something, but can this linear relationship really hold up?
The outflow of ETFs is so fierce, indicating that institutions are indeed panicking, which is not a good signal.
82k? This guy Saunders is too optimistic, feels like we need to drop again at this pace.
With such a bad funding situation, it's futile for retail investors to buy the dip, let's wait and see.
That's how the crypto world is, no matter how perfect the data model is, it can't withstand an emotional crash.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 11-24 16:28
Citibank’s model sounds solid, but nothing surprising—it’s the same old story that liquidity determines price.
Tens of billions flowing out in a row? That’s it then, 82k is all in the past.
Wait, is this data real-time? Maybe we should verify it ourselves.
This round is pretty intense, ETF money is really leaving.
The model looks good, but how the market moves still depends on what the big players think.
With such poor liquidity, maybe the bottom hasn’t arrived yet.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 11-24 16:27
The model from Citibank sounds quite impressive, but with the current poor funding situation, we still need to see if any institutions will catch a falling knife afterward.
---
Is the number 82k real? If not, let's just wait to get slapped in the face, haha.
---
After continuous outflows of tens of billions, the bad news should have been digested enough, right? The time window for low-level accumulation is slowly opening.
---
Forget about believing in that 3.4% rule; there are so many variables in the market.
---
As for Saunders, I bet he will change his tune by the end of the year.
---
Funding is the core issue; everything else is just fluff.
---
Let's wait and see how institutions act; that's the key signal.
---
A $1 billion outflow corresponds to a 3.4% drop... The data looks good, but whether it materializes still depends on people's sentiment.
---
Is this the best time for accumulation? I find it a bit unclear.
---
Citibank is pulling this quantitative trick again; how did last year's predictions go?
The Citigroup research team recently developed an interesting quantitative model - they found a clear mathematical relationship between the inflow and outflow of Bitcoin ETF funds and the price trend of coins.
How exactly is it calculated? For every $1 billion that flows out, the price of BTC is likely to retract by about 3.4%. This pattern also works in reverse: when there is a net inflow of the same amount, the increase is basically proportional. There is an analyst at Citigroup named Saunders, who based on this model directly gave a pessimistic year-end prediction—if the funding situation remains stable (that is, a zero net inflow state), the target price is seen at $82,000.
The problem is that the current situation is worse than "zero inflow." Actual data shows that the ETF has seen outflows of billions of dollars consecutively. If this trend continues, there may be further room for price correction. The market sentiment indeed needs some time to digest.