The president of the San Francisco Fed, Daly, recently sent a signal - she is more worried about a sudden collapse in the job market than a Rebound in inflation.
During a communication on November 25, she bluntly stated: the labor market is now quite weak, and the real risk lies in the possibility of nonlinear drastic changes. “I can't be sure I can respond in advance when it comes to employment.” This sounds a bit precarious, but combined with her strong support for a rate cut next month, the logic is coherent—rather than betting that inflation will spiral out of control, it's better to provide a safety net for the labor market first.
Her judgment is based on an observation: the cost pressures driven by tariffs are actually much milder than predicted at the beginning of the year, and the probability of a sudden inflation outbreak is not high. In contrast, once employment data turns around, the chain reaction will be much harder to manage.
It is worth noting that although Daly does not have voting rights this year, she rarely goes public with dissenting opinions. Now she has clearly aligned herself with rate cuts, which may influence those committee members who are still hesitant about whether to pause interest rate hikes during the meeting on December 9-10. After all, the market is waiting to see how Powell will express himself next.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceNightmare
· 11-27 12:24
The job market collapse is really harder to manage than an inflation explosion, and Daly's logic is sound. Interest rate cuts need to be put on the agenda.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 11-25 21:09
The job market is really more painful than inflation, interest rate cuts should be coming.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 11-24 23:55
Should interest rate cuts be on the agenda? I see, they are trying to Market Stabilization again... With weak employment, point shaving is necessary, this logic seems to make sense everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 11-24 23:35
Once employment collapses, it's truly beyond recovery. It's better to cut interest rates first to stabilize things.
San Francisco Fed President: Employment is more concerning than inflation, and a rate cut in December should be on the agenda.
The president of the San Francisco Fed, Daly, recently sent a signal - she is more worried about a sudden collapse in the job market than a Rebound in inflation.
During a communication on November 25, she bluntly stated: the labor market is now quite weak, and the real risk lies in the possibility of nonlinear drastic changes. “I can't be sure I can respond in advance when it comes to employment.” This sounds a bit precarious, but combined with her strong support for a rate cut next month, the logic is coherent—rather than betting that inflation will spiral out of control, it's better to provide a safety net for the labor market first.
Her judgment is based on an observation: the cost pressures driven by tariffs are actually much milder than predicted at the beginning of the year, and the probability of a sudden inflation outbreak is not high. In contrast, once employment data turns around, the chain reaction will be much harder to manage.
It is worth noting that although Daly does not have voting rights this year, she rarely goes public with dissenting opinions. Now she has clearly aligned herself with rate cuts, which may influence those committee members who are still hesitant about whether to pause interest rate hikes during the meeting on December 9-10. After all, the market is waiting to see how Powell will express himself next.