Scan to Download Gate App

More Download Options

Don't remind me again today

CryptoWorldEmergencyRoom

2025-11-25 16:36:17

Morning vibes in the DeFi space! Something fresh brewing with a project revisiting the ICO playbook—but with a twist.

They're rolling out what they call IWO mechanics, basically anti-dump protocols baked into token distribution. Smart move if you ask me, considering how many launches get wrecked by early sellers.

What caught my attention? Their ranking system on a certain on-chain platform supposedly makes gaming the mindshare metrics nearly impossible. The formula's simple: produce quality content threads, unlock your tokens faster. Rewards actual contribution over bot spam.

Demo's dropping soon apparently. Full walkthrough of how the whole thing operates.

Oh, and contributors are looking at a 3.84% allocation slice. Not massive, but decent for early supporters who put in the work.

Still early days, but the approach feels different from the usual airdrop-and-dump circus we've been seeing. Worth keeping tabs on how this plays out.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SleepTrader

· 11-28 04:50

It's another so-called "anti-dumping" scheme, why do so many people believe it? IWO? Sounds pretty impressive, but can it really restrain the dumpers? Quality content in exchange for token fast unlocking... I've seen this logic a few times now. 3.84% allocation sounds like it's just teasing people. Let's wait for the demo to come out, right now it's all just painting big BTC.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinSkeptic

· 11-28 01:17

Is it another reverse dumping mechanism? Sounds good, but can it really prevent dumping? --- Quality content bonus unlocked... Can this logic hold up? It feels like another new way to play people for suckers. --- 3.84% allocated to contributors, that proportion is a bit stingy, early players only get this little benefit. --- Ranking system to prevent brushing? The NFT community has tried this trick before, but in the end, it was still played badly. --- Wait for the demo to see; just listening to the introduction feels a bit like something that was popular last year, just with a different name. --- I've heard too much about anti-dump protocols. The key is whether anyone will truly enforce the rules afterwards. --- Contributors get priority in unlocking tokens? I wonder if it will end up becoming a tool for large investors to play suckers later on. --- Not complaining, but this kind of mechanism often ends up with the most technically skilled people making money, while retail investors are still trapped by smart contracts.

View OriginalReply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 11-27 11:12

This IWO mechanism doesn't sound so easy to Clip Coupons; finally, someone has thought of this. The anti-dump protocol really needs to be popularized; otherwise, it's always the same act of dumping right after going live. I like the logic of unlocking tokens with quality content, but I don't know how they define "quality"... 3.84% allocated to contributors is acceptable, but the key is to see how it will be executed later; anyone can write on paper. When will the demo drop? I need to see with my own eyes how this system can withstand how many Bots. However, I still don't quite understand how that ranking system specifically prevents botting; it feels like new tricks could easily emerge.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 11-25 17:06

This IWO mechanism sounds pretty good, anyway it's much more reliable than those trash projects that dump right after going live. If content ranking can truly prevent刷, that would be amazing, but the key is to see how the execution is. 3.84% allocation... well, not bad, after all early participants have to get something. Before the demo is out, it's all just talk; we'll wait to see the real operation before saying anything. The anti-dump thing is actually just fixing the old stuff from ICO, who knows how long it can last.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 11-25 17:05

The iwo mechanism sounds good, but can this type of anti-dumping protocol really stop the Whale? Let's wait and see. I like that the quality of the content is linked to the unlocking speed; finally, there’s a project that takes contributors seriously. The 3.84% allocation is a bit thin; we’ll have to see how it adjusts later. With the ranking system and content validation, why does it feel like the same old tricks with a new skin? Let's talk after the demo comes out; right now, just listening to the design concept isn’t very meaningful.

View OriginalReply0

BuyHighSellLow

· 11-25 17:01

ngl this set of things is really just copying the old play from the ICO era, it all depends on whether it can survive the next Bear Market. The anti-dump protocol sounds good, but can it hold up during actual operations? That’s the point of interest. 3.84% allocated to contributors? It feels a bit lackluster, early entrants shouldn’t be played people for suckers again, right?

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagrant

· 11-25 16:57

The anti-dump mechanism sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just talk. Quality content can unlock tokens, I'm on board with this logic... provided it can really trap the Bots. 3.84% allocated to contributors? That number is a bit particular. Let's wait for the demo to come out, no matter how nice it sounds now, it's all in vain. Another project trying to break the airdrop curse, I bet it won't become the next ATM.

View OriginalReply0

OvertimeSquid

· 11-25 16:47

Sounds good, but I'm still a bit skeptical. Why does it feel like every time there's a different mechanism to prevent dumping? Wait, can this ranking system really prevent malicious swiping? I think early on we still need to be more vigilant. 3.84% sounds like a lot, but we need to see the demo before we talk. With anti-dump and quality content, it feels like the rhetoric is quite similar; it just depends on how it's actually implemented. Are early participants going to be played people for suckers again?

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
222.73K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
15.93K Popularity
#GIGGLEAndPIPPINSurge
2.67K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
2.11K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
2.97K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
ZYGO戴歌青蛙
MC:$3.37KHolders:2
0.29%
2
XYY喜羊羊
MC:$3.31KHolders:1
0.00%
3
BEARBear Market Coin
MC:$3.38KHolders:2
0.22%
4
BEARACLESBearacles
MC:$3.34KHolders:1
0.21%
5
bobbob
MC:$3.34KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap