#数字货币市场回升 Will "electric" become the next global hard currency?
Recently, I came across a statement by Musk at the shareholders' meeting, which was quite interesting. He directly proposed a bold idea: there may be no traditional currency in the future, and the unit of measurement might just become watts. His exact words were - "Energy is the real hard currency."
Sounds mysterious? But if you think about it carefully, it is indeed not baseless.
The cryptocurrency market has expanded quite rapidly over the past two years. By the third quarter of 2025, the total market value has soared from 3.46 trillion USD to 3.85 trillion. Musk believes that the competitive logic of digital assets may change in the future—not in terms of who is scarcer, but in terms of who can produce more energy.
If this theory holds, the rules of the game will be completely rewritten. Countries with low electricity generation costs will directly become "mint factories", and companies that master efficient electricity usage technology will essentially hold the power to print money. Imagine this scene: when you buy water at a convenience store, instead of asking the clerk "how much does it cost", you ask "how many kilowatt-hours is this bottle of water worth".
Some people say this is quite similar to Bitcoin. The proof-of-work mechanism of $BTC essentially consumes computing power, and behind that computing power is electricity. Musk simply took this logic further—why not directly write energy proof into the currency protocol.
Of course, there are also many doubts.
Opponents raised a bunch of questions: electricity price fluctuations are even more exaggerated than cryptocurrency prices, how to ensure stability? The environmental costs of coal, hydropower, and photovoltaic energy are completely different, how to unify pricing? Energy storage losses are significant, how to solve this fundamental issue?
But supporters say that what Musk really wants to express is not simply replacing money with electricity, but rather using energy as the underlying logic for value anchoring.
If this idea really comes to fruition, those regions with access to cheap electricity resources will surely wake up smiling. Coincidentally, Musk happens to hold cards with Tesla, SolarCity, and SpaceX. Is this a strategic layout in advance, or just a pie-in-the-sky hype?
$ETH Will these old coins be revalued? Will the next narrative in the crypto market be hidden in the energy revolution?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSleepDeprived
· 11-26 19:35
Musk is at it again, energy hard currency? Sounds like he's paving the way for TSL and his energy empire.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 11-26 12:19
This guy Musk really knows how to do things, using watts as money? It sounds outrageous, but if you think about it, electricity is indeed the hardest asset. I just wonder how we retail investors without mines will survive by then.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 11-26 04:10
Elon Musk's rhetoric sounds like black science fiction, but to be honest, energy anchoring is much more reliable than fiat Benchmark; at least electricity is something tangible that can be felt.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 11-26 04:10
Musk is at it again, is electricity going to be a hard currency? Sounds like a BTC, I bet fifty cents this guy just wants to create a concept for TSL's battery business.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 11-26 04:09
Musk is pulling another big move... The logic behind energy hard currency sounds indeed crazy, but the guy really holds the energy card. However, who will cover the electricity price fluctuation?
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 11-26 04:09
Musk is at it again; energy hard currency sounds explosive, but the fluctuation in electricity prices is indeed a pitfall.
---
But on the other hand, countries with cheap electricity are about to da moon; this logic seems to have some merit.
---
Energy proof sounds fresh, but how to ensure unified pricing? The costs of hydropower and thermal power are completely different.
---
With TSL, SolarCity, and SpaceX combined, is Musk really laying out a strategy or just spinning a story again?
---
It sounds nice to say it's energy anchoring, but frankly, it means countries that can generate electricity will rule the world.
---
Pushing the logic of $BTC to the extreme is indeed quite interesting, but isn't it still a power game?
---
Wait, if electricity becomes hard currency, wouldn't miners directly turn into the Central Bank? That's a bit scary.
---
It feels like another wave of carnival; once the market cools down, it will all mean nothing.
---
Regions with cheap electricity? I bet in the end, it will still be the tech giants who call the shots.
---
The idea of energy replacing money sounds even less stable than stablecoins; why is it being speculated so fiercely?
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 11-26 04:06
Musk is dreaming again, using electricity instead of money? The electricity price changes daily, is this reliable, bro?
Energy hard currency sounds bull, but who will set the price? That's the pitfall.
I just want to know, should I close all positions on the coins I bought now...
Using degrees to settle accounts? The convenience store AE has to learn Quantum Mechanics, haha.
BTC itself is a machine that burns electricity, and now it wants to upgrade to "electric coin"? It feels like another wave of new narrative to play people for suckers.
Countries with cheap electricity will directly To da moon, we are done for.
This idea is crazy, but Musk holds energy and rockets? I'm a bit afraid he might really make some moves.
Is $ETH still worth holding, frens? It feels like the wind is about to change.
#数字货币市场回升 Will "electric" become the next global hard currency?
Recently, I came across a statement by Musk at the shareholders' meeting, which was quite interesting. He directly proposed a bold idea: there may be no traditional currency in the future, and the unit of measurement might just become watts. His exact words were - "Energy is the real hard currency."
Sounds mysterious? But if you think about it carefully, it is indeed not baseless.
The cryptocurrency market has expanded quite rapidly over the past two years. By the third quarter of 2025, the total market value has soared from 3.46 trillion USD to 3.85 trillion. Musk believes that the competitive logic of digital assets may change in the future—not in terms of who is scarcer, but in terms of who can produce more energy.
If this theory holds, the rules of the game will be completely rewritten. Countries with low electricity generation costs will directly become "mint factories", and companies that master efficient electricity usage technology will essentially hold the power to print money. Imagine this scene: when you buy water at a convenience store, instead of asking the clerk "how much does it cost", you ask "how many kilowatt-hours is this bottle of water worth".
Some people say this is quite similar to Bitcoin. The proof-of-work mechanism of $BTC essentially consumes computing power, and behind that computing power is electricity. Musk simply took this logic further—why not directly write energy proof into the currency protocol.
Of course, there are also many doubts.
Opponents raised a bunch of questions: electricity price fluctuations are even more exaggerated than cryptocurrency prices, how to ensure stability? The environmental costs of coal, hydropower, and photovoltaic energy are completely different, how to unify pricing? Energy storage losses are significant, how to solve this fundamental issue?
But supporters say that what Musk really wants to express is not simply replacing money with electricity, but rather using energy as the underlying logic for value anchoring.
If this idea really comes to fruition, those regions with access to cheap electricity resources will surely wake up smiling. Coincidentally, Musk happens to hold cards with Tesla, SolarCity, and SpaceX. Is this a strategic layout in advance, or just a pie-in-the-sky hype?
$ETH Will these old coins be revalued? Will the next narrative in the crypto market be hidden in the energy revolution?