#美国非农数据超预期 has been watching the market data of $BNB for a whole morning, it's quite interesting. The negative bars on the MACD are getting narrower and narrower, it looks like they are about to move up together. Although the price is still swaying below the cloud layer, if you look at the conversion line and the benchmark line, those two are getting closer and closer - what does this indicate? The strength of the short positions is clearly insufficient.
My thought is this: you can consider setting up long positions in the range of 850 to 855, with a stop loss set below 840 for safety. If it really goes up, the first target is 870, followed by testing the levels of 890, 910, and 930 one by one. Of course, while executing the trades, don't forget about position management.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
potentially_notable
· 11-28 18:32
Bro, this technical analysis looks nice, but I'm afraid it's just a last hurrah before the peak.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 11-27 07:14
Well, the short positions really seem a bit unrealistic. Looking at the MACD trend, there is indeed potential.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 11-26 18:17
The short positions are losing momentum, I can see that too, but do I really dare to go long at 850? I'll wait until it breaks 870 before saying anything.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 11-26 05:30
Short positions are not strong, right? I always feel like I'm being tricked into it. I need to take a look at this position of 850 before saying anything.
View OriginalReply0
ArbitrageBot
· 11-26 05:30
Not enough strength in short positions? Why am I still cutting losses haha, I really envy how clearly you see things.
View OriginalReply0
RuntimeError
· 11-26 05:30
Short positions are not strong anymore, right? I'm just afraid it's another false move. Testing the waters at 850 is fine, but this broken cloud layer needs to truly break through to count; otherwise, we'll be stuck here again.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 11-26 05:30
The optimization space for gas fees at 850 is too small, and I'm actually more concerned about whether there are whales hoarding goods in the mempool... If it really takes off, the yield from sandwich arbitrage is much faster than whatever this 870 target is making.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighbor
· 11-26 05:20
I quite agree with the judgment that short positions are not strong, but I'm afraid of the fluctuations. It's possible to layout in the 850 range, but one must control their hands and not be greedy, after all, risk assets have been playing with heartbeats these past two days.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 11-26 05:09
The 880 position feels a bit pressured, but the short positions are indeed weakening. This wave might really start to move.
#美国非农数据超预期 has been watching the market data of $BNB for a whole morning, it's quite interesting. The negative bars on the MACD are getting narrower and narrower, it looks like they are about to move up together. Although the price is still swaying below the cloud layer, if you look at the conversion line and the benchmark line, those two are getting closer and closer - what does this indicate? The strength of the short positions is clearly insufficient.
My thought is this: you can consider setting up long positions in the range of 850 to 855, with a stop loss set below 840 for safety. If it really goes up, the first target is 870, followed by testing the levels of 890, 910, and 930 one by one. Of course, while executing the trades, don't forget about position management.