#美国非农数据超预期 Just now, around 2 PM, on-chain monitoring detected a significant action: a certain anonymous Wallet (starting with 18TsywGQ) transferred out 126 Bitcoins, worth approximately 10.83 million US dollars, first hitting another transit Address (starting with 1DhVRs2).
Interestingly, this sum of money didn't stay idle for long, with 24 BTC flowing directly into a major exchange.
Recently, the operation of "first transferring and then entering the exchange" has become increasingly frequent. Is it that big players are preparing to offload? Or is it just normal chip adjustment? The market is already sensitive, and this kind of capital movement indeed needs to be monitored closely, as it may affect short-term trends. $BTC $ETH $BNB
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkProofGremlin
· 11-30 03:39
It's the same old transfer routine again; it feels like the Large Investors have become smarter lately, just afraid of being watched.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 11-29 14:31
This technique is becoming more familiar; Large Investors like to play tricks like this to avoid being tracked.
View OriginalReply0
RugDocScientist
· 11-27 07:10
126 BTC entered the exchange, this wave is going to fall... Large Investors are all running away, I'm just wondering, who is still catching a falling knife?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 11-27 07:10
Hey, this method feels a bit familiar, I've seen it a few times before, it seems like today’s wave isn’t that simple
Hmm... they’re starting to play the transfer game again, feels like they’re about to dump
Damn, it’s always like this, first they lay the groundwork and then they dump, it’s so annoying
126 Bitcoins get turned around and stuffed into the exchange, this is clearly testing the waters
The whole transfer address setup makes it feel like underground trading, who is really operating this
This rhythm feels a bit rushed, likely going to dump
Every time I see this kind of operation on-chain funds, I get nervous, have to be extra cautious in the short term.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 11-27 07:05
ngl this 18TsywGQ wallet pattern is setting off every red flag in my monitoring system... the middle-layer obfuscation move always precedes major liquidations, pattern analysis suggests we're looking at classic pre-dump positioning here
Reply0
InscriptionGriller
· 11-27 06:58
Hmm? 126 BTC rushed into the exchange, this guy is probably going to play people for suckers again.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 11-27 06:48
Hmm... it's this trap again, the transfer address is being played smoothly, I think it's just to conceal the identification.
#美国非农数据超预期 Just now, around 2 PM, on-chain monitoring detected a significant action: a certain anonymous Wallet (starting with 18TsywGQ) transferred out 126 Bitcoins, worth approximately 10.83 million US dollars, first hitting another transit Address (starting with 1DhVRs2).
Interestingly, this sum of money didn't stay idle for long, with 24 BTC flowing directly into a major exchange.
Recently, the operation of "first transferring and then entering the exchange" has become increasingly frequent. Is it that big players are preparing to offload? Or is it just normal chip adjustment? The market is already sensitive, and this kind of capital movement indeed needs to be monitored closely, as it may affect short-term trends. $BTC $ETH $BNB