Spotted something interesting in prediction markets lately. Here's a move that might give you an edge: spreading your bets across different tickers with opposing YES and NO positions. Sounds counterintuitive? That's exactly the point.
The catch though – only your top 50 trades actually count toward the final tally. So it's not about volume flooding, it's about surgical precision on quality setups. The beauty of this approach? Your score keeps climbing. No backward slides, just steady accumulation if you play it smart.
Not financial advice obviously, but this asymmetric scoring structure creates some wild incentive dynamics worth exploring.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizer
· 11-30 12:41
Well, the arbitrage space constrained by the top 50... I calculated that the capital efficiency of this thing is actually not that high, it requires careful selection.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 11-29 20:13
Only the first 50 trades count? Then all those garbage orders I've made before are just in vain, haha.
View OriginalReply0
FadCatcher
· 11-27 14:49
Wow, this trap logic is something, feels like playing a psychological game.
View OriginalReply0
MevTears
· 11-27 14:49
The hedging operation of the top 50 trading system is indeed clever, but it feels like playing with system vulnerabilities...
Spotted something interesting in prediction markets lately. Here's a move that might give you an edge: spreading your bets across different tickers with opposing YES and NO positions. Sounds counterintuitive? That's exactly the point.
The catch though – only your top 50 trades actually count toward the final tally. So it's not about volume flooding, it's about surgical precision on quality setups. The beauty of this approach? Your score keeps climbing. No backward slides, just steady accumulation if you play it smart.
Not financial advice obviously, but this asymmetric scoring structure creates some wild incentive dynamics worth exploring.