Recently, I tried a points gameplay and I'd like to share some insights. Don't just rush in with large amounts; open orders can save you half the fees. I tested it with a volume of 1 million u, and the wear on a single transaction of 10 u is really not high.
The points rule is pretty straightforward: for a trading volume of 0 to 10 million, 1 point equals 1 coin, considering wear and tear, this is your FDV cost. Remember to recharge on the mainnet and operate on the X version side. The time window is very tight, and the low-cost brushing opportunity will end tomorrow.
The total pool is 100 million points, first come first served. However, I must remind you - the rules are in the hands of the project party, and it could be troublesome if the gameplay changes midway. Weigh it carefully, and don't go all in.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BtcDailyResearcher
· 11-30 17:30
The fact that open orders can save half the transaction fee is indeed stingy, it's just that I'm afraid the project party might suddenly turn against and change the rules.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 11-30 08:58
I have been using the trick of saving on fees with open orders for a long time; testing with 1 million u is indeed stable.
Depositing on the Mainnet can easily lead to pitfalls; I didn't notice it at first either.
Deadline tomorrow? Damn, I need to hurry and enter a position, but I've seen the project party change rules too many times.
Is the pool only 100 million? First come, first served; this really depends on hand speed.
Once again, it's a tight time window; I always feel something is off.
A single transaction loss of 10 u really doesn't hurt, but for a volume of 10 million, that ratio needs to be calculated carefully.
I agree with the phrase "don't rush in"; having the rules in their hands does pose risks.
I didn't expect that using open orders could save so much; I need to give it a try.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 11-30 05:06
1 million u for testing? Brother, this risk factor is a bit high, I still prefer the multi-signature strategy of small amounts and multiple transactions.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 11-27 20:18
Open orders can indeed save money, but this trap gameplay still feels a bit risky.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 11-27 19:04
I need to try reducing fees on open orders, but I feel that this first-come, first-served approach has some significant risks.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersPaper
· 11-27 19:04
Oh my god, 1 million u is still called testing the waters? Brother, you really have guts.
Wait, the deadline is tomorrow? I just saw this...
Open orders save half the transaction fees? How come I always miss this kind of trick?
But speaking of which, the rule is in their hands, that's the real truth; how many projects have done this before?
View OriginalReply0
blocksnark
· 11-27 19:01
I already knew the trick of saving fees on open orders, the problem is having patience.
Deadline tomorrow? It's another trick to rush the schedule, that's the most frustrating part.
It's ridiculous when the rules are in the project party's hands, they can change them whenever they want, what can you do?
However, a loss of 10u is still acceptable, worth a shot.
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegen
· 11-27 19:01
I already knew about this trick to save on fees for open orders, but the problem is that you need to have enough u for it to work.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 11-27 19:00
Open orders this move is indeed economical, but to be honest, the rules change too quickly, it's a bit precarious.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 11-27 18:40
Don't miss the opportunity; time waits for no one. The window for this points gameplay is indeed tight, but don't just listen to my hype; you need to calculate the costs clearly before taking action.
I've mentioned before that using open orders saves on fees, but unfortunately, most people are still blindly going all in, completely unaware of the core logic of the rules.
The 100 million points pool operates on a first-come, first-served basis. To put it simply, whoever seizes the first-mover advantage will profit; that's the key to wealth—provided you recognize the risks, as the project party holds the power to change the rules.
To summarize three points: First, don't be greedy and go all in; second, cost control is the most important; and third, the deadline is tomorrow, so hurry to enter a position, but at the same time, be mentally prepared for uncertainties.
To be honest, those still questioning this type of gameplay now are just like those who questioned blockchain back in the day; the trend is clear.
Recently, I tried a points gameplay and I'd like to share some insights. Don't just rush in with large amounts; open orders can save you half the fees. I tested it with a volume of 1 million u, and the wear on a single transaction of 10 u is really not high.
The points rule is pretty straightforward: for a trading volume of 0 to 10 million, 1 point equals 1 coin, considering wear and tear, this is your FDV cost. Remember to recharge on the mainnet and operate on the X version side. The time window is very tight, and the low-cost brushing opportunity will end tomorrow.
The total pool is 100 million points, first come first served. However, I must remind you - the rules are in the hands of the project party, and it could be troublesome if the gameplay changes midway. Weigh it carefully, and don't go all in.