The new IRS reporting threshold is absolutely absurd. Think about it — someone transfers $1,000 between their own checking and savings via Zelle. A spouse sends rent money to their partner's account. Are these everyday transfers now being flagged as taxable income?
This $600+ reporting mandate creates a bureaucratic nightmare for ordinary transactions that have zero tax implications. We're talking about personal money movement, not unreported earnings. The system treats routine financial activity like suspicious behavior, which raises serious questions about privacy and overreach in traditional finance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTherapist
· 11-29 22:23
This $600 threshold is really insane, even a couple transferring rent money gets targeted?
Why didn't anyone think about the daily transfers of ordinary people, it's just absurd.
With the IRS's approach, they might as well install cameras.
It's another wave of excessive regulation, why has my personal finance become a crime scene?
So traditional finance thinks it can be all-knowing and all-powerful? Laughable.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 11-28 03:31
Starting from 600 dollars? The manipulators are really playing with fire... Even transferring rent between spouses is being monitored, isn't this just a disguised surveillance of financial freedom?
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 11-27 23:53
No way, the couple is being watched just for transferring rent money? This policy is really ridiculous.
This $600 threshold is absurd; ordinary people transferring money are now considered "suspicious individuals."
The IRS really wants to turn everyone into a tax machine, privacy is gone.
Wait, does this mean on-chain transactions will be treated the same way? That would be terrible.
Naked financial surveillance, the evil of centralization.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 11-27 23:53
Do I really have to pay taxes on 600 bucks? I'm just transferring rent to my wife and I'm being monitored, is this a joke?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 11-27 23:50
I really can't believe it, a threshold of 600 dollars is absurdly low. Do I have to be monitored just for transferring my rent money?
---
Is the IRS trying to treat everyone as tax evaders? What about privacy?
---
Do transfers between couples need to be reported too? This is just great, even family finances are no longer free.
---
To put it bluntly, this is financial surveillance, under the guise of tax collection.
---
Zelle transfers are already being flagged. Is the next step going to be requiring registration for cash transactions?
---
This threshold is ridiculous, it effectively means freezing our freedom of daily spending.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 11-27 23:42
Starting at 600 bucks? This is really outrageous. Even when my wife transfers me rent money, we have to be monitored. Are they trying to force us all to use crypto?
The new IRS reporting threshold is absolutely absurd. Think about it — someone transfers $1,000 between their own checking and savings via Zelle. A spouse sends rent money to their partner's account. Are these everyday transfers now being flagged as taxable income?
This $600+ reporting mandate creates a bureaucratic nightmare for ordinary transactions that have zero tax implications. We're talking about personal money movement, not unreported earnings. The system treats routine financial activity like suspicious behavior, which raises serious questions about privacy and overreach in traditional finance.