Still switching wallets back and forth on different chains? A new player is breaking this hassle.
Recently noticed a quite interesting DeFi project, the core idea is very straightforward: allowing you to manage all trading operations across multiple chains with a single account. Perpetual contracts? Spot trading? Even RWA? All centralized in the same interface.
Sounds ambitious, but if it can really be achieved, it can indeed solve quite a few practical pain points. Multi-chain operation is already a headache, switching wallets back and forth, calculating Gas fees over and over, and liquidity is scattered across various platforms.
Whether this "unified" approach can be successfully implemented depends largely on whether the product experience and underlying technical architecture can hold up. However, the direction is quite clear – what DeFi needs is a lower barrier to entry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
25 Likes
Reward
25
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeWhisperer
· 11h ago
Another "one-stop solution" dream... Sounds good, but how many can really reduce gas fees?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 22h ago
Is this for real? Another multi-chain one-click solution, there are projects like this every year, and they all end up failing.
Wait, can it really manage the gas fees too? Now that would be impressive.
To be honest, the fragmented liquidity is indeed annoying, but how is the technical architecture not a bomb?
Every day they boast about unification, but the result is still various latencies when using it. It would be better to just connect a few mainstream chains honestly.
Is this for real this time or just another fundraising story? I'll wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 11-29 13:06
Well said, switching Multichain Wallets is indeed annoying.
Another dream of unification, can the technology keep up? That's the key.
A centralized trading interface sounds great, but I'm afraid it will just be a new way to Be Played for Suckers.
The gas fees saved might be eaten back by the platform fees, so this needs to be calculated carefully.
If it can be done with one click, I'll go all in, but the premise is that the security better not be disappointing.
View OriginalReply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 11-28 22:51
Sounds good, but I bet this is another project that will fall through halfway.
---
Multi-chain aggregation has been talked about for several years, but I haven't seen a truly useful one.
---
The key issue is the gas fees; no matter how much you aggregate, users still have to pay.
---
If it really can manage all chains with one account, I would believe it, but I feel like the technical architecture will be a big pitfall.
---
It looks beautiful, but I'm afraid using it will still be just as troublesome.
---
The issue of liquidity dispersion cannot be solved at all, this is not a UX issue.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 11-28 05:55
This one-stop solution sounds nice, but I'm afraid it's just another BTC project.
---
I've seen too many multi-chain aggregation attempts, and very few are actually usable, but this idea does hit the pain point.
---
The key is whether the gas fees can be saved; otherwise, it won't be much different from now.
---
Ambition is good, but whether the product can be realized is the key; let's wait and see.
---
A wallet to dominate the world sounds great, but I'm afraid it's just another PPT project.
---
Liquidity fragmentation is indeed annoying; if this can really solve the problem, I might give it a try.
---
Another unified dream of DeFi; how many of these projects have actually succeeded?
---
It's somewhat interesting, but the technical architecture needs to be looked into deeply; otherwise, it's just a castle in the air.
View OriginalReply0
SundayDegen
· 11-28 05:53
It's another multi-chain aggregation trap, sounds impressive, but I'm afraid it's another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 11-28 05:51
You're right, it's really annoying to switch chains and wallets now. It would be great if it could be done all in one place.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 11-28 05:43
It's the same old trap of multi-chain aggregation. It sounds good, but how many actually work? Let's first look at the TVL and gas consumption data.
View OriginalReply0
Andrii31
· 11-28 05:40
good
Reply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 11-28 05:33
Sounds good, but how does it actually work? Right now, what I fear the most are these all-encompassing projects; if one interface crashes, everything is doomed.
Still switching wallets back and forth on different chains? A new player is breaking this hassle.
Recently noticed a quite interesting DeFi project, the core idea is very straightforward: allowing you to manage all trading operations across multiple chains with a single account. Perpetual contracts? Spot trading? Even RWA? All centralized in the same interface.
Sounds ambitious, but if it can really be achieved, it can indeed solve quite a few practical pain points. Multi-chain operation is already a headache, switching wallets back and forth, calculating Gas fees over and over, and liquidity is scattered across various platforms.
Whether this "unified" approach can be successfully implemented depends largely on whether the product experience and underlying technical architecture can hold up. However, the direction is quite clear – what DeFi needs is a lower barrier to entry.