The capital flow data from yesterday hides some insights. BCH had a net inflow of 65 million USD in a single day, while MET faced dumping of 147 million – this kind of differentiated trend reveals more than just simple market fluctuations.
First, let's look at the surface: Large amounts of BTC and ETH have been flowing out, causing many people to panic. But if you think calmly, this may be exactly the effect that big funds want. When retail investors sell off due to the adjustment of mainstream coins, the small coins that absorb funds against the trend are quietly accumulating chips. The net inflow of funds in targets like BCH and TRX stands in stark contrast to the outflow of mainstream coins.
Looking deeper into the logic. The MET plummeting and ZEC outflows exceeding 40 million USD signify a concerning collective withdrawal from such high-controlled coins. The old trick of raising prices to offload is well-known, and chasing the price often leads to becoming the last buyer. In contrast, those coins that continue to attract funding, although they may not take off immediately in the short term, at least indicate that capital is being deployed.
Every round of reshuffling in the market is essentially a redistribution of wealth.
Retail investors often make the mistake of following their emotions—panicking when mainstream coins drop and chasing after small coins when they rise. The real opportunities are often hidden in the details of capital flow. Net inflow does not mean an immediate surge, but net outflow is indeed a dangerous signal. Learning to understand the game theory behind the data is much more important than blindly following the trend.
Observe the flow of funds calmly, and don't be misled by appearances. This market has never lacked stories; what it lacks is independent judgment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkLibertarian
· 12-01 12:38
The dumping of bcm is really something, I've lost a lot.
I didn't chase that wave of MET, thank goodness.
I've heard the theory of capital flow a thousand times, but the key is that no one can predict the next step.
To be honest, I only half believe in the logic of small coins absorbing chips.
If there's a net outflow, just run, this trick is the most practical.
Retail investors are just too greedy, wanting to gamble on everything they see.
I'm avoiding coins with high market control now, it's too easy to get played for suckers.
The strategies of large funds are hard to guard against, it's better to watch more and act less.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLucky
· 11-30 23:29
They're talking about the flow of funds again, sounding nice but when it comes to dumping, no one can escape.
In the end, those who chase the price are all dumb buyers; this statement is correct.
Is the inflow of BCH this time reliable? It feels a bit strange.
Cutting losses is the most painful, but you're right, staying calm helps see clearly.
Net inflow of small coins does not equal that one must enter a position; this logic needs to be reversed.
Data looking good isn't as important as a good Wallet; I still trust trading partners over stories.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoFear
· 11-28 13:09
Goodness, it's that same old trick of capital differentiation again. We retail investors are always the last to know.
Wait, this logic has some substance... Do you believe that the outflow of mainstream tokens is simply playing people for suckers?
If BCH rises, then it's all over, isn't it? This isn't the first time we've seen this script.
That chunk of MET should have died a long time ago, don't blame me for not warning you.
The key thing is that the pros have already positioned themselves in small coins, and we're only just now realizing it. The gap is truly astounding.
Capital doesn't lie, we're just afraid that we can't understand that convoluted reasoning.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 11-28 13:01
BCH has absorbed so much money... it feels like they're going to start playing people for suckers again.
Retail investors will want to chase BCH after reading this article, but they'll end up being the dumb buyers.
That wave of MET was really tragic; if I had known, I would have run away earlier.
It's true, but those who hear this will still lose money, haha.
The flow of funds is essentially just large investors dancing, while we're just watching the show.
A bunch of people are studying the data, and if the conclusions are all the same, it means there are no opportunities.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 11-28 12:55
This is yet another wave of Be Played for Suckers rhythm. I bet five bucks that there’s a big market maker behind the dumping of MET.
The 65 million inflow into BCH is also suspicious. Small coins are easy to manipulate, retail investors shouldn’t be fooled by this data.
Wait a minute, why does this logic sound like it's trying to persuade me to buy the dip on small coins... I'll just stay on the sidelines.
I've seen too many scenarios where money inflow ends up with dumping. This net inflow thing is just for reference.
I won't chase it anymore; it's more reliable to hold BTC and sleep peacefully.
The capital flow data from yesterday hides some insights. BCH had a net inflow of 65 million USD in a single day, while MET faced dumping of 147 million – this kind of differentiated trend reveals more than just simple market fluctuations.
First, let's look at the surface: Large amounts of BTC and ETH have been flowing out, causing many people to panic. But if you think calmly, this may be exactly the effect that big funds want. When retail investors sell off due to the adjustment of mainstream coins, the small coins that absorb funds against the trend are quietly accumulating chips. The net inflow of funds in targets like BCH and TRX stands in stark contrast to the outflow of mainstream coins.
Looking deeper into the logic. The MET plummeting and ZEC outflows exceeding 40 million USD signify a concerning collective withdrawal from such high-controlled coins. The old trick of raising prices to offload is well-known, and chasing the price often leads to becoming the last buyer. In contrast, those coins that continue to attract funding, although they may not take off immediately in the short term, at least indicate that capital is being deployed.
Every round of reshuffling in the market is essentially a redistribution of wealth.
Retail investors often make the mistake of following their emotions—panicking when mainstream coins drop and chasing after small coins when they rise. The real opportunities are often hidden in the details of capital flow. Net inflow does not mean an immediate surge, but net outflow is indeed a dangerous signal. Learning to understand the game theory behind the data is much more important than blindly following the trend.
Observe the flow of funds calmly, and don't be misled by appearances. This market has never lacked stories; what it lacks is independent judgment.