AI tech will probably benefit humanity overall, but there's a real chance things could go sideways. That's exactly why we need regulatory frameworks—governments stepping in as neutral arbiters to safeguard the public interest. Zero risk doesn't exist, so oversight matters.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HodlOrRegretvip
· 12-01 22:14
Regulation sounds reliable, but can the government really be a "neutral arbitrator"? I doubt it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9vip
· 12-01 19:16
Uh, about the regulation... Can the government really act as a "neutral arbitrator"? Why don't I believe that?
View OriginalReply0
SleepTradervip
· 11-29 09:22
Can the government really act as a "neutral referee"? I just can't believe it, history has always played out like this...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatchervip
· 11-28 22:56
Well said, but can the government really be a good "neutral arbitrator"? History tells us it's not very likely.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOraclevip
· 11-28 22:51
The regulatory framework sounds good, but we all know that the government acting as a "neutral arbitrator"... uh, can we really trust that?
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxietyvip
· 11-28 22:49
Government neutral arbitration? Uh... I doubt how effective this will be.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegenvip
· 11-28 22:29
Damn, it's again this trap of regulation... The government acts as a "neutral arbitrator"? Haha, I'm laughing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)