AI tech will probably benefit humanity overall, but there's a real chance things could go sideways. That's exactly why we need regulatory frameworks—governments stepping in as neutral arbiters to safeguard the public interest. Zero risk doesn't exist, so oversight matters.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HodlOrRegret
· 12-01 22:14
Regulation sounds reliable, but can the government really be a "neutral arbitrator"? I doubt it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 12-01 19:16
Uh, about the regulation... Can the government really act as a "neutral arbitrator"? Why don't I believe that?
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 11-29 09:22
Can the government really act as a "neutral referee"? I just can't believe it, history has always played out like this...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 11-28 22:56
Well said, but can the government really be a good "neutral arbitrator"? History tells us it's not very likely.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 11-28 22:51
The regulatory framework sounds good, but we all know that the government acting as a "neutral arbitrator"... uh, can we really trust that?
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 11-28 22:49
Government neutral arbitration? Uh... I doubt how effective this will be.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 11-28 22:29
Damn, it's again this trap of regulation... The government acts as a "neutral arbitrator"? Haha, I'm laughing.
AI tech will probably benefit humanity overall, but there's a real chance things could go sideways. That's exactly why we need regulatory frameworks—governments stepping in as neutral arbiters to safeguard the public interest. Zero risk doesn't exist, so oversight matters.