Scan to Download Gate App

More Download Options

Don't remind me again today

Altcoin侦探

2025-11-28 23:29:27

What if you could actually own the infrastructure powering the next generation of crypto? That's the core bet behind MetaDAO's vision.

Think about it - genuine ownership of:
• The banking rails
• Privacy protocols that actually matter
• Stablecoins with real utility
• The DeFi machinery running 24/7
• AI models built for decentralized networks

Sure, execution risk is always lurking. Projects can stumble, tech can fail. But here's the difference: this isn't just another memecoin casino where you're gambling against some whale dumping their dog-themed bags. This is infrastructure ownership - the picks and shovels play for the onchain economy.

The question isn't whether every protocol will succeed. It's whether owning the fundamental layers beats speculating on the next viral PFP drop. Different game entirely.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GlueGuy

· 1h ago

To be honest, the logic of infrastructure ownership sounds good, but when it comes to execution... it's another story. Many projects' commitments start this way.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLord

· 11-30 04:02

The infrastructure aspect really needs to be taken seriously, much better than gambling on shitcoins.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeOnChain

· 11-28 23:59

The infrastructure sector is indeed different, but how many can truly be implemented?

View OriginalReply0

BankruptWorker

· 11-28 23:59

Infrastructure is the way to go, don't be played for suckers by shitcoins anymore.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 11-28 23:56

Analyzing from a technical architecture perspective, there is a clear flaw in this logic—ownership of infrastructure and protocol success rates are actually two independent variables and cannot be conflated. Research shows that even having control over the underlying infrastructure does not guarantee the usability and adoption rate of upper-layer applications. It's worth noting that historical data indicates that most "infrastructure" tokens underperform in the long term compared to vertical AppChains in the absence of real application scenarios driving their value. This "pickaxe theory" sounds enticing, but the execution difficulty is severely underestimated.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyValidator

· 11-28 23:53

The infrastructure part is indeed interesting, but whether MetaDAO can be successfully implemented really depends on execution... Many projects before have also made a lot of noise.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArtisanHQ

· 11-28 23:36

ngl, the "picks and shovels" framing is giving me walter benjamin meets smart contract logic... but here's the thing—who actually owns the means of production when the code itself is the commodity? that's the real deconstruction we should be having.

Reply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 11-28 23:36

Alright, I really don't want to read any more descriptions of infrastructure, every project claims to be pick and shovel...

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
220.87K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
16.63K Popularity
#GIGGLEAndPIPPINSurge
2.87K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
2.22K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
3.06K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
морекоты
MC:$3.32KHolders:1
0.00%
2
ZYGO戴歌青蛙
MC:$3.37KHolders:2
0.29%
3
XYY喜羊羊
MC:$3.31KHolders:1
0.00%
4
BEARBear Market Coin
MC:$3.38KHolders:2
0.22%
5
BEARACLESBearacles
MC:$3.34KHolders:1
0.21%

Sitemap