To be honest, it's quite confusing: why is $MON considered undervalued?
Is it just because a few investment firms publicly claimed that they entered at a valuation of 3 billion USD in full circulation?
By this logic, there must be a ton of tokens in the market that are "undervalued", right? Institutions say whatever valuation they want, and that's what it is? This pricing reference standard is just too childish.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ParanoiaKing
· 21h ago
Is institutional valuation the golden rule? Then if I value myself at 1 yuan, am I also undervaluing myself?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenRugs
· 11-30 10:38
Institutional quotes are acceptable as a reference, but when it comes to the truth, it's outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CodeZeroBasis
· 11-29 07:52
Can the valuation given by the organization be used as data? If I say that the coin I bought for 100 is worth 1000, does that also mean it is undervalued?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 11-29 07:44
Institutional valuation = undervalued? Laughing to death, then I would also be a genius if I valued myself at 1 yuan
---
To put it bluntly, it’s just self-praise, this kind of rhetoric is everywhere
---
3 billion? No matter how I look at it, it seems like daydreaming, wake up everyone
---
Undervalue my ass, it’s just that no one is catching a falling knife
---
According to this logic, I can also say I’m undervalued by a thousand times, ridiculous
---
Institutional rhetoric is the most invincible, anyway, no one can prove them wrong
---
I really don’t understand why there are still people who believe in this set, it’s too magical
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 11-29 07:27
Is the institutional valuation really that serious? Then I'll also count myself at 100 bucks in full circulation, instantly doubling my wealth, haha.
To be honest, it's quite confusing: why is $MON considered undervalued?
Is it just because a few investment firms publicly claimed that they entered at a valuation of 3 billion USD in full circulation?
By this logic, there must be a ton of tokens in the market that are "undervalued", right? Institutions say whatever valuation they want, and that's what it is? This pricing reference standard is just too childish.