You might brush this off as technical jargon—but here's the kicker: the whole strategy of using monetary policy to tame inflation? It hinges entirely on the Euler coefficient. Without that assumption holding up, central banks are basically flying blind.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugee
· 12-02 09:43
If the Euler coefficient really collapses, the central banks will be completely blind.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 11-30 15:46
In a state of blind flying? Doesn't this mean that the central banks actually understand nothing, relying on a coefficient to hold everything up? It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 11-29 21:04
If the Euler coefficient doesn't hold, the Central Banks would really become headless flies.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 11-29 20:59
Are central banks really betting that a mathematical formula can save the world? This logic seems a bit questionable.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 11-29 20:57
If this Euler coefficient is unstable, will the central banks really be groping in the dark?
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 11-29 20:55
The term "flying blind" is really something; it would be awkward if the central banks' Euler coefficients collapsed.
You might brush this off as technical jargon—but here's the kicker: the whole strategy of using monetary policy to tame inflation? It hinges entirely on the Euler coefficient. Without that assumption holding up, central banks are basically flying blind.