[Coin World] Trump's AI and Crypto Assets advisor David Sacks recently got into trouble—he holds 708 technology investments, of which 449 are AI companies, and these companies are likely to directly benefit from the policies he leads. After the media uncovered this matter, it sparked quite a controversy.
Sacks himself did not hold back in his rebuttal, calling the accusations “nonsense.” He did indeed receive a moral exemption to sell off most of his Crypto Assets and AI assets, but the specifics disclosed? Very vague. Critics like Senator Elizabeth Warren are not buying it, pointing out the blurred lines between his policy role and personal investments. Sacks' team insists that everything is compliant and there are no conflicts of interest.
It is worth noting that Sacks also participated in discussions to lift the export restrictions on Nvidia chips, and his podcast “All-In” even hosted a White House AI summit. However, his lawyer emphasized that this program operates as a non-profit organization and there are no special interests involved. But the external doubts about his intertwined identity are clearly not going to dissipate easily.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropF5Bro
· 11-30 22:30
Sure, this guy is really bold, claiming no conflicts with 449 AI investments? I'm dying of laughter.
---
So moral exemption is useful, right? Just keep the details vague and that's it.
---
This move is indeed amazing, taking advantage of policy benefits while spouting nonsense, really speechless.
---
With 708 investments, they only talk about selling, but who knows how they're actually sold? Anyway, the information gap is right here.
---
Policy makers and major shareholders are one and the same, this logic can really make sense to everyone.
---
To put it bluntly, it's still the same old trick; as long as the lawyer says it's fine, then it's fine, while everyone else is drunk, I'm the only one sober.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 11-30 22:28
The term "moral exemption" is really something, isn't it? It sounds like a pass you give yourself, and you can wave your hand and say it’s nonsense? It's quite funny.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 11-30 22:28
This ethical exemption is as good as nonexistent here; what transparency is there to talk about with such vague disclosures?
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 11-30 22:25
Here we go again with this trick, thinking moral exemptions can allow anything to happen?
---
708 investments and 449 AI projects, this number is ridiculous at first glance; it's nicely called a conflict of interest, but harshly it's just a loophole in the system.
---
Why do the words "nonsense" sound so familiar... every time a sensitive topic arises, it's the same old story.
---
Wait, this guy is openly holding AI company stocks and then setting AI policies? Why am I still here hoarding coins...
---
Vague details are just tacit acknowledgment, this acting is impressive.
---
So the question is... how were those moral exemptions approved? That's the key.
---
Here we go again, what year is it that they're still playing this trick of "conflict does not exist."
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 11-30 22:18
Oh, this is what we call a conflict of interest, moral exemption? That's funny.
Trump's encryption advisor caught in a conflict of interest storm: 449 AI investments raise regulatory concerns.
[Coin World] Trump's AI and Crypto Assets advisor David Sacks recently got into trouble—he holds 708 technology investments, of which 449 are AI companies, and these companies are likely to directly benefit from the policies he leads. After the media uncovered this matter, it sparked quite a controversy.
Sacks himself did not hold back in his rebuttal, calling the accusations “nonsense.” He did indeed receive a moral exemption to sell off most of his Crypto Assets and AI assets, but the specifics disclosed? Very vague. Critics like Senator Elizabeth Warren are not buying it, pointing out the blurred lines between his policy role and personal investments. Sacks' team insists that everything is compliant and there are no conflicts of interest.
It is worth noting that Sacks also participated in discussions to lift the export restrictions on Nvidia chips, and his podcast “All-In” even hosted a White House AI summit. However, his lawyer emphasized that this program operates as a non-profit organization and there are no special interests involved. But the external doubts about his intertwined identity are clearly not going to dissipate easily.