That 67 meme coin has some serious narrative potential—honestly the upside could be massive. But here's the thing: if they redirected those dev fees away from the current setup into a dedicated marketing wallet focused purely on short-form content and TikTok campaigns, I'd actually think about taking a real position.
The story writes itself. The execution? That's been the weak point so far. The fundamentals for virality are there, but the operational side needs a complete overhaul. Right now it feels like wasted opportunity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractTester
· 20h ago
Damn, you're right. Just having a story isn't enough; it's all about whether you can execute it properly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 12-08 09:34
To put it simply, it's a "Schrödinger's bull market"—good narrative but poor execution, a typical bubble-era artwork, haha.
Is changing the dev fee direction really such a game-changer? I think it needs to rely on DAO governance mechanisms to save it, otherwise even the best story is pointless.
There's definitely a gap in TikTok marketing, but for a meme coin to really 10x, it still depends on community consensus; otherwise, it's just a beautiful fantasy.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 12-07 10:55
NGL, the story behind this coin is actually compelling, but the marketing is really lacking... Using the dev fund to go all-in on TikTok is the real way forward.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 12-07 10:54
NGL, the devs just know how to brag. How many of them actually understand operations?
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 12-07 10:53
ngl dev costs are definitely a pain point, but having just a narrative isn’t enough
---
Wait, can they really nail the marketing? That’s the real key
---
The story is great, but the operations are a complete mess—such a waste
---
The viral potential is clearly there, it’s just a matter of whether they’re willing to spend money to reorganize
---
Reallocating dev costs to focus on TikTok could actually work, but execution is a big question mark
---
To put it bluntly, it’s like having a golden spoon but not using it in the right place
---
All the fundamentals are there, what’s missing is someone smart enough to run the show
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 12-07 10:47
NGL, the dev expenses are really being wasted like this, it's unbelievable. Are we just letting a TikTok viral hit slip by?
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 12-07 10:38
Yeah, the story behind 67 is definitely compelling, but the operations are really weak. The dev might as well just go all-in on marketing.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 12-07 10:32
NGL, the dev fee part is really lacking. This coin has a story to tell, but they just don't know how to tell it.
That 67 meme coin has some serious narrative potential—honestly the upside could be massive. But here's the thing: if they redirected those dev fees away from the current setup into a dedicated marketing wallet focused purely on short-form content and TikTok campaigns, I'd actually think about taking a real position.
The story writes itself. The execution? That's been the weak point so far. The fundamentals for virality are there, but the operational side needs a complete overhaul. Right now it feels like wasted opportunity.