Here's something most people missed: before that heavyweight spot ETF dropped in January 2024, Bitcoin ETFs were already sitting on roughly $25 billion. But here's the catch—most of that wasn't fresh money flooding in. It was legacy holders, especially from GBTC, shuffling their chips into newer ETF wrappers. Just a giant game of musical chairs with existing capital.
Then the game changed. When that dominant product hit the market, we finally saw real appetite. New institutional flows. Actual incremental demand, not just repackaging old positions. That's when the ETF narrative shifted from "conversion play" to "expansion phase." The difference? One's a zero-sum reshuffle. The other's rocket fuel.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter
· 6h ago
Damn, so that previous wave was actually just GBTC people flipping around? The real new money only came in January, no wonder institutions are rushing like crazy now.
View OriginalReply0
ETHReserveBank
· 7h ago
In plain terms, that wave of people in GBTC was just trading old money; the real growth came later. This is what true expansion looks like now.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 12-10 08:25
I think this analysis is a bit of a trick... The 2.5 billion wave is purely a stock game, and the old leeks of GBTC are just changing their vests, which I have seen for a long time. The real increment is the story 21 years later, and now looking back at the wave in 24 years is the breaking point, not a mysterious event, that is, the institution has really begun to enter.
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 12-08 15:01
ngl, that previous batch of GBTC transfers doesn’t really count as new inflows, it’s just shuffling around. The real new money is coming from the spot ETFs in January 🚀
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlooker
· 12-08 14:57
NGL, the previous 2.5 billion was just GBTC guys trading among themselves. The real inflow only came after January.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 12-08 14:55
Hmm... I have to question this logic. The $25B in existing stock is indeed mostly "transferred" from GBTC, but saying there is absolutely no new demand is too absolute. According to institutional research data from early 2024, at least 15-20% of the increase comes from new institutional entrants, so it can't all be considered a zero-sum game.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420
· 12-08 14:47
ngl this is the real truth, that previous wave of ETF inflows was just a numbers game on paper.
View OriginalReply0
degenonymous
· 12-08 14:43
ngl, I knew for a long time that the GBTC wave was just old wine in a new bottle. The real growth will only come when institutions put real money into the market.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-08 14:41
ngl this is exactly why the January pump was nothing... The real fresh newbies haven't even entered the market yet
Here's something most people missed: before that heavyweight spot ETF dropped in January 2024, Bitcoin ETFs were already sitting on roughly $25 billion. But here's the catch—most of that wasn't fresh money flooding in. It was legacy holders, especially from GBTC, shuffling their chips into newer ETF wrappers. Just a giant game of musical chairs with existing capital.
Then the game changed. When that dominant product hit the market, we finally saw real appetite. New institutional flows. Actual incremental demand, not just repackaging old positions. That's when the ETF narrative shifted from "conversion play" to "expansion phase." The difference? One's a zero-sum reshuffle. The other's rocket fuel.