2025-12-10 03:23:41

That Australian policy forcing kids under 16 off social platforms? Built on shaky evidence and flawed reasoning. When regulators make calls without solid data, they're not protecting anyone—just creating enforcement nightmares while the real issues stay unaddressed.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ImaginaryWhale

· 8h ago

Is regulation really for protection? I think it's mostly just following trends. Policies without data support ultimately just take it out on the kids, addressing the symptoms but not the root cause.

View OriginalReply0

P2ENotWorking

· 12-10 03:53

NGL's policy is to slap the head, and it will start to be banned without any data support... Who can really protect it, it's just trouble

View OriginalReply0

DisillusiionOracle

· 12-10 03:52

The regulatory authorities pat their heads to make decisions, this time it is really outrageous... Do you want to ban children from the Internet without finding out the evidence? If you don't solve any of the practical problems, you just create trouble

View OriginalReply0

OneBlockAtATime