In order for a blockchain network to survive long-term, it absolutely needs a reliable token economic model. KITE's approach is quite interesting—it doesn't let the native token KITE carry all functions from the very beginning, but instead chooses a phased rollout. This choice itself reflects the project's consideration of sustainable development.
Let's start with the initial phase. During this stage, KITE is mainly used for ecosystem participation and incentives. Developers can earn rewards through it, node operators can cover their costs, and early users can benefit as well. The core goal of this phase is simple: to get more AI agents and applications running on the network, creating genuine transaction demand and data flow. It's not about creating false prosperity, but about accumulating real network activity.
Moving forward in time, KITE's functionality begins to expand. Staking, governance, transaction fees—these features will be gradually introduced. The staking mechanism can enhance network security while providing stable incentives for long-term participants. The governance feature allows token holders to have real say, enabling them to influence protocol parameters, upgrade directions, and key decisions. As for the transaction fee mechanism, it links the token's value to the actual usage of the network— the more you use it, the higher its practical value.
Why adopt this phased approach? The most direct benefit is to avoid the over-financialization issues seen in early stages. If all functions are opened up at once, speculative capital can flood in, causing huge price volatility, and ultimately, genuine contributors may get caught in the turmoil. Conversely, a phased approach allows the token's value to be more driven by real usage needs rather than market sentiment.
In the long run, whether KITE can establish stable value depends on its close linkage with the prosperity of the AI agent economy. In other words, it relies not on market hype, but on the genuine growth of AI-related applications and transactions on the network.
In a network where AI is a core participant, the role of the token is not just a tool for incentives. It also serves as a crucial medium for coordinating interests among different stakeholders and aligning incentives. KITE's design logic is built on this foundation—it aims to balance the needs of short-term participants with room for long-term governance. Only in this way can it provide the necessary support for the stable evolution of the network.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightSeller
· 7h ago
The phased approach is indeed sophisticated, avoiding the chaos of early influxes of funds rushing into trading coins.
---
In simple terms, it's just afraid that the coin price will rise too quickly, and the true builders will be cut.
---
I'm a bit curious whether the subsequent governance mechanism can really be implemented or if it's just a pie in the sky.
---
It looks like a clear plan; it all depends on whether the AI proxy ecosystem can truly take off.
---
This step-by-step design is much more reliable than projects that open all features right from the start.
---
Wait, how do early participants ensure they won't be repeatedly diluted by later entrants?
---
Holding a "try it out" attitude, at least it's not the typical routine of cutting leeks all at once.
---
Binding token value to practical applications sounds good, but I'm worried it will ultimately become just a pure investment asset.
---
I can understand the logic behind KITE; the question is whether it can be executed effectively.
---
No hype, no blackening; this phased design is more thoughtful than most coins on the market.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHere
· 7h ago
Gradual decentralization, this approach is indeed clever, avoiding the initial dump of the token.
But to be honest, it still depends on whether AI applications can really take off later; otherwise, all models are just wasted.
This wave is a bit like back in the DeFi days, talking up a storm, but only a few actually survived.
If the staking governance fee combination can be implemented smoothly, KITE definitely has a chance, but the prerequisite is that the ecosystem must really be hot.
Bet on it surviving the next winter.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 7h ago
Launching this move in phases is really clever, unlike some projects that dump all features at once, only to see the coin price go up and down like a roller coaster.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggee
· 7h ago
Phased release of features, this move is indeed clever. But it depends on whether the subsequent AI ecosystem can truly take off; otherwise, it's still just empty talk.
In order for a blockchain network to survive long-term, it absolutely needs a reliable token economic model. KITE's approach is quite interesting—it doesn't let the native token KITE carry all functions from the very beginning, but instead chooses a phased rollout. This choice itself reflects the project's consideration of sustainable development.
Let's start with the initial phase. During this stage, KITE is mainly used for ecosystem participation and incentives. Developers can earn rewards through it, node operators can cover their costs, and early users can benefit as well. The core goal of this phase is simple: to get more AI agents and applications running on the network, creating genuine transaction demand and data flow. It's not about creating false prosperity, but about accumulating real network activity.
Moving forward in time, KITE's functionality begins to expand. Staking, governance, transaction fees—these features will be gradually introduced. The staking mechanism can enhance network security while providing stable incentives for long-term participants. The governance feature allows token holders to have real say, enabling them to influence protocol parameters, upgrade directions, and key decisions. As for the transaction fee mechanism, it links the token's value to the actual usage of the network— the more you use it, the higher its practical value.
Why adopt this phased approach? The most direct benefit is to avoid the over-financialization issues seen in early stages. If all functions are opened up at once, speculative capital can flood in, causing huge price volatility, and ultimately, genuine contributors may get caught in the turmoil. Conversely, a phased approach allows the token's value to be more driven by real usage needs rather than market sentiment.
In the long run, whether KITE can establish stable value depends on its close linkage with the prosperity of the AI agent economy. In other words, it relies not on market hype, but on the genuine growth of AI-related applications and transactions on the network.
In a network where AI is a core participant, the role of the token is not just a tool for incentives. It also serves as a crucial medium for coordinating interests among different stakeholders and aligning incentives. KITE's design logic is built on this foundation—it aims to balance the needs of short-term participants with room for long-term governance. Only in this way can it provide the necessary support for the stable evolution of the network.