2025-12-25 13:21:36

Over the past year, a well-known DEX platform has undergone a comprehensive overhaul of its core product line. Not only that, its infrastructure, internal systems, and even community operations have experienced deep-level optimization and upgrades.

What is particularly noteworthy is that the platform has built a dedicated community collaboration space, allowing these updates to be openly shared, tested, verified, and become the focus of community discussion. This increase in transparency and participation directly reflects the project's dedication to ecosystem development—from technical breakthroughs at the code level, to governance innovations at the community level, and continuous iteration of user experience, forming a complete closed loop.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RetroHodler91

· 8h ago

Really? So many actions in just one year? Let's see what actually comes out of it. Speaking of transparency, that's a good thing, at least it's not messing around blindly. The community collaboration space is quite interesting; finally, there's a project that takes users seriously. Wait, have technological breakthroughs and governance innovations truly closed the loop, or are they just talk? But on the other hand, daring to test and iterate in front of the public really takes some guts.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 8h ago

全面重构听起来不错，但关键是这一年下来留存率涨了没？光有透明度没用，得看用户活跃数据说话 --- Community collaboration space, I've seen too many of these, and in the end, they just become chat groups. How many people actually participate in governance? --- Optimizing code layer, community layer, and user experience? That closed loop sounds exhausting. I want to see actual data on trading depth and gas efficiency improvements. --- Transparency + participation can form a closed loop? Come on, what’s missing is the sustainable design of the token incentive model. Without that, everything is pointless. --- Talking nicely, but it's better to just release the data. Active addresses, daily trading volume, community governance voting rate— which indicator has really turned upward? --- After so much restructuring, could it actually reduce the product's playability? I'm worried that changing things might drive users away. --- Infrastructure optimization is still interesting, as long as there's no suspicion of centralized decision-making involved. --- The real test is next year. Let's see if this so-called complete closed loop can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 8h ago

Bro, this update really looks like you're actually working, not just making empty promises on paper. I'm optimistic about the community collaboration space; at least it's much better than some projects that boast every day. To put it simply, open source and transparency are well done, which is how Web3 should look. The entire closed-loop logic is indeed solid, but of course, it depends on whether they can actually deliver in the future. Has there been a third-party audit for contract security? If this continues, the activity level should increase, after all, the community can participate. Compared to those projects that work behind closed doors, this approach's strength lies in transparency. No hype, no blackening; let's see if they can maintain this pace moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 8h ago

Oh wow, this actually looks decent. Finally, it's not just a project that only talks the talk. Rebuilding the product line is superficial; the key is transparency... Do they really take the community seriously? Did you hear? Some projects just change the UI and dare to claim an ecosystem upgrade. These guys are serious. No wonder the community discussion has been so lively lately. Creating a closed loop is easy to say but hard to do. Working on code + governance + experience—this shows they want to play the long game, not just run after a quick profit. I used to think they had potential when I followed them before, and now it's confirmed. I'm paying attention to the community collaboration space, see how they implement it later. Face-slapping to those project teams who only know how to boast.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 8h ago

Sounds good, but the real test is on the user side. Whether it can truly solve the issues of slippage and gas fees is the key. To be honest, there are many community discussions, but can the actual product updates keep up? This is the most critical point. It's been a year of restructuring, but it still feels a bit laggy. Transparency has improved, but what about efficiency? I believe in their determination, but I've heard too many claims of "complete closed loops." In the end, it's all about the data. It's quite innovative, but I wonder how good the actual experience will be.

View OriginalReply0