The choice between different FDV levels shapes incentive structures in profound ways. When we evaluated dropping to $99.99m, cancelling the early unlock option became theoretically possible—a bold move that could have reshaped holder economics. It's an unconventional incentive design worth exploring. However, the practical constraints kicked in: we ultimately had to set the early exit threshold at $300m FDV instead. Sometimes elegant tokenomics designs collide with real-world parameters. The decision reflects the tension between what's theoretically optimal and what's operationally feasible in token launch mechanics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MissedAirdropBro
· 8h ago
99.99m that theory is possible in principle, but once implemented, compromises are necessary. That's the crypto world for you—perfect solutions always die in reality.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 8h ago
lmao the $300m compromise is just governance theater disguised as pragmatism. they'll always pick the "feasible" path over what actually disrupts the incentive structure... classic protocol cowardice dressed up as tokenomics wisdom
Reply0
DaoTherapy
· 8h ago
In plain terms, the ideal is very full but the reality is very bleak. The 99.9m plan sounds impressive, but in the end, it still has to be compromised to 300m. Web3's old problem.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_ptsd
· 8h ago
Alright, the ideal is very full, but the reality is very bleak. The 99.99m plan sounds really attractive, but in the end, we still have to compromise to 300m. This is the fate of Web3 projects...
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 8h ago
It sounds like the ideal is very grand, but the reality is quite harsh... The 99.99m launch window is beautiful, but once the data is checked, it falls apart. In the end, it still has to be set according to the 300m gravity level.
The choice between different FDV levels shapes incentive structures in profound ways. When we evaluated dropping to $99.99m, cancelling the early unlock option became theoretically possible—a bold move that could have reshaped holder economics. It's an unconventional incentive design worth exploring. However, the practical constraints kicked in: we ultimately had to set the early exit threshold at $300m FDV instead. Sometimes elegant tokenomics designs collide with real-world parameters. The decision reflects the tension between what's theoretically optimal and what's operationally feasible in token launch mechanics.