2025-12-25 13:24:15

To be honest, this can be considered a necessary feedback from the market. Recently, the ICO approach has been somewhat disappointing for participants—many projects report an inflated FDV during fundraising, with Monad, MegaETH, and others being examples.

It's good to see project teams adjusting based on market conditions. This kind of flexibility is commendable in the current environment, and I support this direction.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotSatoshi

· 12-28 09:42

The FDV numbers should have been exposed a long time ago. It's a bit late to make adjustments now.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoTarotReader

· 12-28 04:57

The inflated FDV scheme should have been cut long ago; this is the true way to respect players.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 12-25 13:54

The inflated FDV has long needed to be addressed; the retail investors are almost being harvested dry.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightMEVeater

· 12-25 13:47

Good morning, it's you guys again who got caught by FDV and only then realized... But honestly, it's better when project teams admit defeat and make adjustments, rather than stubbornly continue to hype up overestimated valuations.

View OriginalReply0

FomoAnxiety

· 12-25 13:43

The tactic of inflating FDV is getting old; someone should have already pulled the project team to wake up.

View OriginalReply0

PortfolioAlert

· 12-25 13:42

Here we go again, the FDV inflation issue really needs to be regulated. Someone should have exposed this facade long ago.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 12-25 13:37

The inflated FDV has long been outdated; I'm tired of it.