【Crypto World】Just past the halfway point of 2025, the ecosystem competition among L1 public chains is becoming increasingly fierce. Based on the latest on-chain data statistics, let’s take a look at the actual user scale of major public chains.
BNB Chain currently has an average of 4.32 million daily active users, far ahead of other public chains. This number is already quite impressive — it means that the ecological applications on BNB Chain continue to attract a large number of users.
Solana follows closely, with an average of 3.23 million daily active users. Although the gap is not small, it remains at a relatively high level. NEAR Protocol ranks third with 3.15 million, and the competition among the three is still quite intense.
TronDAO has a user base of 2.55 million, ranking fourth but occupying a significant market share. Meanwhile, Aptos currently has an average of 1.03 million daily active users, still in the追赶 stage.
From this data, the Matthew effect among leading L1 public chains is quite evident — users and ecosystems are concentrating towards the top. However, there is still room for latecomers, and the key lies in whether ecological applications can continue to innovate and improve user experience.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ReverseTrendSister
· 23m ago
BNB is still fierce, with 4.32 million daily active users, no joke... Is Solana slowing down a bit?
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 4h ago
Is BNB really that powerful? It feels like Solana is falling further and further behind.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 4h ago
The BNB gap is indeed incredible; it's tough for Sol to catch up.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 4h ago
BNB still dominates absolutely, 4.32 million vs 3.23 million, Sol is still a bit behind.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 4h ago
BNB this number is too exaggerated, 4.32 million daily active users? Feels like all bots haha
Solana is still holding up, but the gap is indeed large
Aptos is only 1.03 million, this progress is a bit awkward
TronDAO is underestimated, 2.55 million is actually quite a lot
BNB's ecosystem is indeed top-notch, far ahead of other public chains
Solana users are very loyal, still willing to stick around
This competitive landscape is basically set, it's hard for a dark horse to emerge
Is user scale the same as actual value? Not necessarily
Why does NEAR with 3.15 million still rank third? Feels like it has no presence
Wait, Aptos is only in the millions? I remember it being hyped for so long
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuth
· 5h ago
BNB's gap is quite significant, 4.32 million vs 3.23 million, it's hard for Solana to catch up.
2025 L1 public chain active users overview: BNB Chain remains in first place, with Solana close behind
【Crypto World】Just past the halfway point of 2025, the ecosystem competition among L1 public chains is becoming increasingly fierce. Based on the latest on-chain data statistics, let’s take a look at the actual user scale of major public chains.
BNB Chain currently has an average of 4.32 million daily active users, far ahead of other public chains. This number is already quite impressive — it means that the ecological applications on BNB Chain continue to attract a large number of users.
Solana follows closely, with an average of 3.23 million daily active users. Although the gap is not small, it remains at a relatively high level. NEAR Protocol ranks third with 3.15 million, and the competition among the three is still quite intense.
TronDAO has a user base of 2.55 million, ranking fourth but occupying a significant market share. Meanwhile, Aptos currently has an average of 1.03 million daily active users, still in the追赶 stage.
From this data, the Matthew effect among leading L1 public chains is quite evident — users and ecosystems are concentrating towards the top. However, there is still room for latecomers, and the key lies in whether ecological applications can continue to innovate and improve user experience.