Bitcoin and Ethereum have recently seen new developments. Starting from December 25th, the next year will be a critical window for Ethereum scalability upgrades.



Some developers believe that an important fork upgrade may occur in 2026. According to plans, the Gas limit is expected to surpass the 200 million mark, representing a huge leap for network throughput. An increasing number of validators are turning to zero-knowledge proof (ZK) technology, pushing Layer 1 towards the goal of processing ten thousand transactions per second — although this target may be difficult to achieve in the short term.

On the Layer 2 side, the situation is even more promising. After data block expansion, certain Layer 2 solutions might handle hundreds of thousands of transactions per second. The ZKsync Atlas upgrade allows funds to remain on the mainnet, enabling fast transaction settlement within a resilient network. Furthermore, cross-chain interoperability layers are also in development, potentially enabling truly seamless transfers between L2 solutions in the future. Privacy protection is also included in the upgrade plans, with anti-censorship capabilities expected to be enhanced. But whether these ambitious blueprints can be realized on schedule remains uncertain.

Recently, a hot topic has been the threat of quantum computing to cryptocurrencies. Many people are discussing this, but AI organizations and crypto research teams hold different views. They point out that by 2026, the practical application of quantum computing in the commercial field will still be extremely limited. According to these experts’ estimates, at least 90% of the so-called "quantum threat" in the market is marketing hype.

But can the risk really be ignored? There are indeed some areas worth paying attention to. The public key cryptography relied upon by the Bitcoin network, especially the ECDSA algorithm, theoretically has vulnerabilities. Data shows that about 25% to 30% of Bitcoin are stored at addresses where the public key has already been exposed, which does pose potential risks from a technical perspective. Security teams have even proposed an "collect first, decrypt later" attack hypothesis — collecting encrypted data today to be cracked with quantum computers in the future.

The community isn’t idle either. Some development teams are planning to upgrade cryptographic frameworks to provide quantum-level protection for hot wallets. Practical advice from experts includes: avoid repeatedly using the same address, and when quantum-resistant wallets become truly available, migrate your funds promptly. Whether this is proactive planning or over-worrying, opinions vary.

Back to the main question: Do you think Ethereum can truly break through its scalability bottleneck in 2026? Is the quantum threat a serious real risk that needs to be taken seriously, or is it overhyped? Feel free to share your thoughts.
BTC-0.21%
ETH-1.04%
ZK-1.23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 7h ago
The Ethereum expansion in 2026... It's politely called a window period, but harshly it's just another cycle of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf." ZK technology is indeed elegant, but implementation has always been more difficult than writing white papers. Regarding the quantum threat, I don't fully agree with the conclusion that 90% is marketing hype. The fact that 25-30% of Bitcoin is stored in exposed public key addresses, plus the logic of "collect first, decrypt later"... this is not alarmist. Ancient artifacts also degrade this way; invisible risks are often the most deadly. Actually, don't be so pessimistic, and don't be overly optimistic either. Moving funds to a new wallet now is like providing timely protection for digital inheritance. The time cost is worth the peace of mind.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeansvip
· 7h ago
Damn, another 2026 Bitcoin bull run? Let's first fulfill the promises made for 2025. By the way, that 25-30% of BTC in exposed addresses—are these numbers real? That's a bit scary. ZK rollups are indeed impressive, but it feels like another "wolf is coming" scenario, a repeated cycle. I believe the 90% hype about quantum threats, but does the remaining 10% need to make the news? Instead of waiting for the Atlas upgrade, it's better to rotate wallet addresses first, just to be safer.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHuntervip
· 7h ago
200 million Gas cap sounds impressive, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on luck. Every time the topic of nah scalability is hyped up, and in the end? Delayed updates. Quantum threats are 90% marketing... but that remaining 10% keeps me from sleeping well. Accumulating some quantum-resistant wallets first might be more valuable than the worries themselves.
View OriginalReply0
ChainProspectorvip
· 7h ago
200 million Gas limit sounds great, but can it be implemented... There are too many lessons from history. Mostly pure marketing, but that 25% exposed public key is indeed a bit scary. ZKsync's recent upgrade is quite interesting and worth paying attention to. The expansion dream is very ambitious, but reality might require more waiting. Quantum threat has a lot of metaphysical elements, but protective awareness should be in place.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 7h ago
200 million Gas cap sounds great, but when it comes to actual implementation... well, I’m not really convinced. The threat of quantity feels like just hype; I believe this data has 90% marketing elements. Frequently changing addresses isn’t a bad idea; just consider it as insurance.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)