Recently, the Bitcoin market has been oscillating around $100,000, and an interesting phenomenon has emerged. Large holders with over 1,000 Bitcoins have started gradually reducing their holdings, while small retail investors continue to buy in steadily. On the surface, it looks like the big players are fleeing, but a deeper analysis of on-chain data reveals that the situation is much more complex.



Let's look at the data first. Over the past month, net outflows of funds from spot Bitcoin ETFs amounted to about $2.8 billion, which can easily give the impression that institutions are exiting en masse. However, a closer look at the whale wallets holding over 10,000 Bitcoins shows that their balances only decreased by 1.5% in October. This decline is hardly a fire sale; in fact, it can be considered quite moderate.

The key is to understand where these funds are going. Whales are not panic-selling; they are taking profits during periods when ETF demand isn't strong enough. This kind of operation has been repeated across past market cycles: when capital inflows and liquidity conditions improve, these strategic rebalancing actions often set the stage for subsequent upward trends by readjusting market positions and volatility structures.

In other words, seasoned players are engaging in the common practice seen on major exchanges—rotating positions at the end of a cycle to prepare for the next rally. They are not leaving the market; they are simply shifting funds from one pocket to another.
BTC0.2%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 5h ago
Is it another whale run-away theory again? Wake up, it's only down 1.5%, and this is called exiting? --- Retail investors buy the dip, institutions sell... I'm tired of this excuse, on-chain data can't really prove anything. --- Haha, fine, let's just pretend they're really "pocket to pocket," anyway I still have to gamble. --- 28 billion outflow sounds like a lot, but when you do the math, it's not as scary as it seems. --- Major holders reducing by 1.5% can still be spun as strategic rebalancing, this copywriting is pretty good haha. --- Basically, it's just waiting for the next cycle to continue repeatedly cutting the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamervip
· 6h ago
Are you still talking about big players running away? Wake up, a 1.5% drop is not running away, I laughed. Are whales really that smart? We retail investors are still buying the dip. But on the other hand, an ETF outflow of 2.8 billion sounds pretty scary, but on-chain data doesn't lie. I'll believe half of this explanation. Wait, they're just moving money from one pocket to another. If the next market wave really comes, do we still have a chance? Tsk, old players are just old players. This move is indeed clever. Anyway, if I follow the trend and buy, I’ll definitely be a leek (chives) again.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollectorvip
· 6h ago
You're trying to fool retail investors into taking the fall again. Large investors reducing their positions is just that—reducing positions. No matter how you package it, you can't change the fundamental fact of running away.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_traumavip
· 6h ago
It's the same old story. When Big Whale makes a small move, it's interpreted as a strategic layout. I think they're just looking for reasons to justify their own buying. Retail investors follow the trend with 100,000 and buy into this wave, waiting to be harvested. What does a net outflow of 2.8 billion from ETFs mean? It doesn't change the fact that the price of the coin can't go up. A large holder reducing their position by 1.5% is called moderate? Then if I get liquidated by 50%, can I be called aggressive? Every day, on-chain data, on-chain data, but in the end, it all comes down to what the order book says.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFundvip
· 6h ago
Ha, it's the same old story. Are large investors reducing their positions to pave the way for the next rally? It sounds to me like they're just comforting themselves. Retail investors are still buying nonstop. Isn't that just classic retail trap? Come on. Is a 1.5% drop considered mild? Then should a 50% loss be called a "slight adjustment"? Veteran players are just moving from one pocket to another. Basically, they're just offloading, but their methods are more covert. I've seen this move too many times. Every time they say it's strategic rebalancing, but what happens? Retail investors are left waiting for the next big move.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)